)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":36716,"name":"Kyuyeong Lee","display_name":"Kyuyeong Lee","email":"kyu0.lee@samsung.com","username":"kyu0"},"change_message_id":"90283acf5521ef6cac6d87beca155264c62c8e06","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"865d4214_ee5bb08c","updated":"2026-09-21 06:42:05.000000000","message":"The check failures are all ImportError: cannot import name \u0027port_group\u0027 from \u0027neutron_lib.api.definitions\u0027.\nThis series needs the neutron-lib API definitions from 1006159, which is not installed from source by the standard jobs, so Depends-On does not help here.\nThe series will pass once that change merges and neutron-lib is released.\nReviews of the code itself are very welcome in the meantime.","commit_id":"3fae26fc24976b2f375bb3d3555720d9e68e45e2"},{"author":{"_account_id":5890,"name":"Doug Goldstein","email":"cardoe@cardoe.com","username":"cardoe"},"change_message_id":"6e9a522c2003db0bbeb4c295ce8587d4db74820b","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"4392c6e9_ced6a675","updated":"2026-10-09 15:06:02.000000000","message":"I think we should potentially call this \"port range\" instead of \"port group\". \"port group\" is used in other places as a generic term for bonded ports","commit_id":"fe548b57ab5334131dfc4199f486b1b61e7ec730"},{"author":{"_account_id":36716,"name":"Kyuyeong Lee","display_name":"Kyuyeong Lee","email":"kyu0.lee@samsung.com","username":"kyu0"},"change_message_id":"db0d4b35db9624918869a2e6cdb3891765602bdc","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"788e322a_88889c4a","in_reply_to":"4392c6e9_ced6a675","updated":"2026-10-12 00:20:37.000000000","message":"Thanks for the review. I think that is a fair point. \"Port group\" is also used inside Neutron for the OVN Port_Group of each security group. I\u0027m open to renaming it before the neutron-lib definitions (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/1006159) merge.\n\n\"Port range\" might be confusing, though, since SG rules already use it for port_range_min/max, and the group holds port ranges itself. How about \"port range group\"?\n\nBrian, Rodolfo: since the name comes from the spec, what would you prefer?","commit_id":"fe548b57ab5334131dfc4199f486b1b61e7ec730"}]}