)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":8124,"name":"cbrandily","email":"zzelle@gmail.com","username":"cbrandily"},"change_message_id":"b19030fc19a7e5a462d5f78e233bcb805462da17","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":7,"context_line":"DON\u0027T MERGE Remove allow_overlapping_ips"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"I\u0027m just pushing this up to see what breaks by taking this out (if"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"anything).  Also, to collect feedback on the idea of deprecating and"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"removing it.  If we do decide to remove this it should be properly"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"deprecated and removed a release later, not like this.  So, if I move"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"forward I\u0027ll do it properly."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"1aca2d91_854a4582","line":10,"updated":"2015-05-06 22:25:09.000000000","message":"allow_overlapping_ips is useful on private/enterprise clouds[1] using fixed-ips (no NAT) to reach vms from external networks.","commit_id":"ff5aab8cbd6b809872dd8b0d78879391f11b936f"},{"author":{"_account_id":7448,"name":"Carl Baldwin","email":"carl@ecbaldwin.net","username":"carl-baldwin"},"change_message_id":"1c3cd05628787dd676f3dbc899beccefe56d8783","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":7,"context_line":"DON\u0027T MERGE Remove allow_overlapping_ips"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"I\u0027m just pushing this up to see what breaks by taking this out (if"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"anything).  Also, to collect feedback on the idea of deprecating and"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"removing it.  If we do decide to remove this it should be properly"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"deprecated and removed a release later, not like this.  So, if I move"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"forward I\u0027ll do it properly."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"9af37de9_cbdbb11a","line":10,"in_reply_to":"1aca2d91_3bf80049","updated":"2015-05-11 15:44:21.000000000","message":"@Cedric, you make a lot of sense.  I think address scopes could be a good way to tackle this in the future.  This is good feedback.\n\nI will give a little thought to migration from \"allow_overlapping_ips\" to exclusive (or default) use of an address pool and maybe that will enable the deprecation of this feature.","commit_id":"ff5aab8cbd6b809872dd8b0d78879391f11b936f"},{"author":{"_account_id":8124,"name":"cbrandily","email":"zzelle@gmail.com","username":"cbrandily"},"change_message_id":"8c33e2a8b87941d2595956348f181b6dd4b71ecc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":7,"context_line":"DON\u0027T MERGE Remove allow_overlapping_ips"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"I\u0027m just pushing this up to see what breaks by taking this out (if"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"anything).  Also, to collect feedback on the idea of deprecating and"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"removing it.  If we do decide to remove this it should be properly"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"deprecated and removed a release later, not like this.  So, if I move"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"forward I\u0027ll do it properly."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"1aca2d91_3bf80049","line":10,"in_reply_to":"1aca2d91_45451fb1","updated":"2015-05-07 21:55:59.000000000","message":"[1] was referencing a commit message i lost :(\n\nOn some deployments, NAT is not used[2] to reach vms from external networks but only routing ... it implies we cannot have overlapping cidrs otherwise we will have overlapping routes.\n\nBut perhaps allow_overlapping_ips can be replaced by a default required subnetpool or address scope[3]?\n\n\n[2] typically in private/enterprise clouds or/and when vm ip is considered as a way to identify a vm for traceability.\n\n[3]https://review.openstack.org/180267 :)","commit_id":"ff5aab8cbd6b809872dd8b0d78879391f11b936f"},{"author":{"_account_id":7448,"name":"Carl Baldwin","email":"carl@ecbaldwin.net","username":"carl-baldwin"},"change_message_id":"3bfefd1d604f1aba47d072f942df15dae8026220","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":7,"context_line":"DON\u0027T MERGE Remove allow_overlapping_ips"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"I\u0027m just pushing this up to see what breaks by taking this out (if"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"anything).  Also, to collect feedback on the idea of deprecating and"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"removing it.  If we do decide to remove this it should be properly"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"deprecated and removed a release later, not like this.  So, if I move"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"forward I\u0027ll do it properly."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"1aca2d91_45451fb1","line":10,"in_reply_to":"1aca2d91_854a4582","updated":"2015-05-07 21:03:23.000000000","message":"Examples?  Either you didn\u0027t provide your reference or you meant to refer to my reference on L19 (which itself doesn\u0027t really reference anything).  Is anyone really using this capability?","commit_id":"ff5aab8cbd6b809872dd8b0d78879391f11b936f"},{"author":{"_account_id":8124,"name":"cbrandily","email":"zzelle@gmail.com","username":"cbrandily"},"change_message_id":"b19030fc19a7e5a462d5f78e233bcb805462da17","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":13,"context_line":"forward I\u0027ll do it properly."},{"line_number":14,"context_line":""},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"Seems to me like we have overlapping IP capability everywhere.  What"},{"line_number":16,"context_line":"prevents us from removing this?  This has been brought up at least"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"once on the mailing list [1]."},{"line_number":18,"context_line":""},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-May/036336.html"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"1aca2d91_a57421fd","line":16,"updated":"2015-05-06 22:25:09.000000000","message":"We should deprecate/remove use_namespace option first?","commit_id":"ff5aab8cbd6b809872dd8b0d78879391f11b936f"},{"author":{"_account_id":7448,"name":"Carl Baldwin","email":"carl@ecbaldwin.net","username":"carl-baldwin"},"change_message_id":"3bfefd1d604f1aba47d072f942df15dae8026220","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":13,"context_line":"forward I\u0027ll do it properly."},{"line_number":14,"context_line":""},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"Seems to me like we have overlapping IP capability everywhere.  What"},{"line_number":16,"context_line":"prevents us from removing this?  This has been brought up at least"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"once on the mailing list [1]."},{"line_number":18,"context_line":""},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-May/036336.html"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"1aca2d91_05084790","line":16,"in_reply_to":"1aca2d91_a57421fd","updated":"2015-05-07 21:03:23.000000000","message":"Is it not deprecated?","commit_id":"ff5aab8cbd6b809872dd8b0d78879391f11b936f"}]}