)]}'
{"doc/source/devref/neutron_common_flow_classifier_specification.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":14605,"name":"vikram.choudhary","email":"vikschw@gmail.com","username":"vikram.choudhary"},"change_message_id":"7c8621db0673521c8628a45f9e2aa501b9198674","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":223,"context_line":" | tenant_id            | string  | RO, all| from auth | N/A         | Id of tenant                |\r"},{"line_number":224,"context_line":" |                      | (UUID)  |        | token     |             |                             |\r"},{"line_number":225,"context_line":" +----------------------+---------+--------+-----------+-------------+-----------------------------+\r"},{"line_number":226,"context_line":" | name                 | string  | RW, all| None      | string      | Name of classifier          |\r"},{"line_number":227,"context_line":" | (Required)           |         |        |           |             |                             |\r"},{"line_number":228,"context_line":" +----------------------+---------+--------+-----------+-------------+-----------------------------+\r"},{"line_number":229,"context_line":" | description          | string  | RW, all| None      | string      | Human-readable description  |\r"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3aaa91ec_c8d91e24","line":226,"updated":"2016-06-24 14:22:56.000000000","message":"why name needs to be a key?","commit_id":"1151fa75fadf143fe3c4776c1ec95a8f726011d0"},{"author":{"_account_id":14605,"name":"vikram.choudhary","email":"vikschw@gmail.com","username":"vikram.choudhary"},"change_message_id":"7c8621db0673521c8628a45f9e2aa501b9198674","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":229,"context_line":" | description          | string  | RW, all| None      | string      | Human-readable description  |\r"},{"line_number":230,"context_line":" | (Optional)           |         |        |           |             |                             |\r"},{"line_number":231,"context_line":" +----------------------+---------+--------+-----------+-------------+-----------------------------+\r"},{"line_number":232,"context_line":" | protocol             | string  | RW, all| None      | string      | IP protocol number          |\r"},{"line_number":233,"context_line":" | (Optional)           |         |        |           |             | (icmp, tcp, udp, and so on) |\r"},{"line_number":234,"context_line":" |                      |         |        |           |             | empty means allow any       |\r"},{"line_number":235,"context_line":" +----------------------+---------+--------+-----------+-------------+-----------------------------+\r"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3aaa91ec_480d2ee7","line":232,"updated":"2016-06-24 14:22:56.000000000","message":"priority defined in L50 is missed","commit_id":"1151fa75fadf143fe3c4776c1ec95a8f726011d0"},{"author":{"_account_id":14605,"name":"vikram.choudhary","email":"vikschw@gmail.com","username":"vikram.choudhary"},"change_message_id":"7c8621db0673521c8628a45f9e2aa501b9198674","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":356,"context_line":"The Approach 1 classifier has the advantage that it is simpler, has less levels of hierarchy,\r"},{"line_number":357,"context_line":"and has the \"not\" operation. For example, since Approach 1 classifier combines all the required classification rules\r"},{"line_number":358,"context_line":"in the flow classifier resource, a single REST API request is needed to create a flow-classifier.\r"},{"line_number":359,"context_line":"In Approach 2, it seems separate REST calls would be required to create the rules for a flow classifier.\r"},{"line_number":360,"context_line":"Other APIs are needed to create the classifier group and the classifier chain (Not very sure about this).\r"},{"line_number":361,"context_line":"\r"},{"line_number":362,"context_line":"As to the differences in terms of adding additional parameters for the classifier, in Approach 1,\r"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3aaa91ec_e8bcdabc","line":359,"updated":"2016-06-24 14:22:56.000000000","message":"IMO, approach 2 will be better w.r.t. to DB record size and operations..","commit_id":"1151fa75fadf143fe3c4776c1ec95a8f726011d0"}]}