)]}'
{"neutron/tests/fullstack/resources/config.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":748,"name":"Armando Migliaccio","email":"armamig@gmail.com","username":"armando-migliaccio"},"change_message_id":"d4415b151bf34313f46fd557facf6d84889fc3fa","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":152,"context_line":"                \u0027integration_bridge\u0027: self._generate_integration_bridge(),"},{"line_number":153,"context_line":"                \u0027of_interface\u0027: host_desc.of_interface,"},{"line_number":154,"context_line":"                \u0027ovsdb_interface\u0027: host_desc.ovsdb_interface,"},{"line_number":155,"context_line":"                \u0027use_veth_interconnection\u0027: host_desc.use_veth_interconnection,"},{"line_number":156,"context_line":"            },"},{"line_number":157,"context_line":"            \u0027securitygroup\u0027: {"},{"line_number":158,"context_line":"                \u0027firewall_driver\u0027: \u0027noop\u0027,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":2,"id":"7a8ec9b2_d47879fb","line":155,"updated":"2016-09-13 22:37:32.000000000","message":"Before jumping with this, I\u0027d like to find closure with [1]. We may want to decide to stop exposing this knob to users, and yet continue to use this mechanism where/if required. To this aim we may need to refactor how veth pairs are used by the OVS agent. I wonder if we want to go ahead with this coverage so that the refactoring can be validated by this, or refactor first and ensure further coverage.\n\n[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1587296","commit_id":"89b86fce9472e5e324e0afdb210a918babb9e30b"}],"neutron/tests/fullstack/test_connectivity.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":8873,"name":"Assaf Muller","email":"amuller@redhat.com","username":"amuller"},"change_message_id":"7eaf985d6f0953adb7da0a86a82ef48b2850c961","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":95,"context_line":"        (\u0027veth\u0027, {\u0027use_veth_interconnection\u0027: True}),"},{"line_number":96,"context_line":"        (\u0027non-veth\u0027, {\u0027use_veth_interconnection\u0027: False})]"},{"line_number":97,"context_line":"    scenarios \u003d testscenarios.multiply_scenarios("},{"line_number":98,"context_line":"        network_scenarios, interface_scenarios, veth_scenarios)"},{"line_number":99,"context_line":""},{"line_number":100,"context_line":"    def test_connectivity(self):"},{"line_number":101,"context_line":"        self._test_connectivity()"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":2,"id":"9a89bdaa_15c85754","line":98,"updated":"2016-09-13 16:57:03.000000000","message":"I don\u0027t think we need to multiply the current tests by two... It\u0027s probably enough to add one new test that uses veth_interconnection.","commit_id":"89b86fce9472e5e324e0afdb210a918babb9e30b"}]}