)]}'
{"neutron/tests/functional/agent/l3/framework.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":8655,"name":"Jakub Libosvar","email":"libosvar@redhat.com","username":"jlibosva"},"change_message_id":"92e82a34c9c8402ee5ca3fe27f8d4c0f7285a742","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":286,"context_line":""},{"line_number":287,"context_line":"        if enable_ha:"},{"line_number":288,"context_line":"            self._assert_ha_device(router)"},{"line_number":289,"context_line":"            common_utils.wait_until_true("},{"line_number":290,"context_line":"                lambda: router.keepalived_manager.get_process().active)"},{"line_number":291,"context_line":""},{"line_number":292,"context_line":"        self._delete_router(self.agent, router.router_id)"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"3a71b18c_e9aafd84","line":289,"updated":"2016-12-01 09:56:11.000000000","message":"Can we limit it with better timeout? 60 seconds to start a process seems very long.","commit_id":"84179a0af9871ae67faafe36502b208e7999a757"},{"author":{"_account_id":12444,"name":"John Schwarz","email":"jschwarz@redhat.com","username":"jschwarz"},"change_message_id":"0ade6be43bac8a6cb7ebe230987294823b0fddb0","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":286,"context_line":""},{"line_number":287,"context_line":"        if enable_ha:"},{"line_number":288,"context_line":"            self._assert_ha_device(router)"},{"line_number":289,"context_line":"            common_utils.wait_until_true("},{"line_number":290,"context_line":"                lambda: router.keepalived_manager.get_process().active)"},{"line_number":291,"context_line":""},{"line_number":292,"context_line":"        self._delete_router(self.agent, router.router_id)"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"3a71b18c_89aa696f","line":289,"in_reply_to":"3a71b18c_e9aafd84","updated":"2016-12-01 09:58:04.000000000","message":"Done","commit_id":"84179a0af9871ae67faafe36502b208e7999a757"}]}