)]}'
{"neutron/plugins/openvswitch/agent/ovs_neutron_agent.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":8788,"name":"Miguel Angel Ajo","email":"mangelajo@redhat.com","username":"mangelajo"},"change_message_id":"e0e252bf25144af9f9344d3b5977d8f37352254f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":970,"context_line":"                          {\u0027device\u0027: device, \u0027e\u0027: e})"},{"line_number":971,"context_line":"                resync \u003d True"},{"line_number":972,"context_line":"                continue"},{"line_number":973,"context_line":"            self.port_unbound(device)"},{"line_number":974,"context_line":"        return resync"},{"line_number":975,"context_line":""},{"line_number":976,"context_line":"    def treat_ancillary_devices_removed(self, devices):"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"AAAATn%2F%2BlQA%3D","line":973,"updated":"2013-11-22 20:28:21.000000000","message":"Ok, I understand that previously, if the port existed it was never unbounded.\n\nIt looks good to me, but I\u0027m not voting since I\u0027m not very familiar with the code, but I\u0027ll keep watching.","commit_id":"c8a2cd5d285a69f97776e36f39e7f7b71d2434b7"}]}