)]}'
{"doc/source/admin/config-sriov.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":6873,"name":"Matt Riedemann","email":"mriedem.os@gmail.com","username":"mriedem"},"change_message_id":"cd78962b2fe1b81227958175b9ec1ef0389ec988","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":645,"context_line":"  the guest. Direct mode SR-IOV interfaces (vnic-type: direct or direct-physical)"},{"line_number":646,"context_line":"  are detached before the migration and reattached after the migration so this is not"},{"line_number":647,"context_line":"  transparent to the guest. To avoid loss of network connectivy when live migrating"},{"line_number":648,"context_line":"  with direct mode sriov the user should create a failover bond in the guest with a"},{"line_number":649,"context_line":"  transparently live migration port type e.g. vnic-type normal or indirect mode SR-IOV."},{"line_number":650,"context_line":""},{"line_number":651,"context_line":"  .. note::"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"bfb3d3c7_222fa688","line":648,"range":{"start_line":648,"start_character":25,"end_line":648,"end_character":33},"updated":"2019-05-30 17:58:25.000000000","message":"Live migration is admin-only by default and meant to be transparent to the user, so how is the user supposed to know about this ahead of time? Or is this more just a best practice if you\u0027re going to use those types of ports and expect to be live migrated?","commit_id":"fec048c5614b6d903fcb553810d068b29c1ca8a6"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"8e7848e2ab4feb502278f6021b846c34618b76dc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":645,"context_line":"  the guest. Direct mode SR-IOV interfaces (vnic-type: direct or direct-physical)"},{"line_number":646,"context_line":"  are detached before the migration and reattached after the migration so this is not"},{"line_number":647,"context_line":"  transparent to the guest. To avoid loss of network connectivy when live migrating"},{"line_number":648,"context_line":"  with direct mode sriov the user should create a failover bond in the guest with a"},{"line_number":649,"context_line":"  transparently live migration port type e.g. vnic-type normal or indirect mode SR-IOV."},{"line_number":650,"context_line":""},{"line_number":651,"context_line":"  .. note::"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"bfb3d3c7_82ca129e","line":648,"range":{"start_line":648,"start_character":25,"end_line":648,"end_character":33},"in_reply_to":"bfb3d3c7_222fa688","updated":"2019-05-30 18:09:41.000000000","message":"this is intended as a best practice for VNF vendors deploying in a telco environment where SR-IOV is need for throughput but its acceptable for performance to degrade as long as peering session are maintained during migrations.\n\nin such an environment the user is typically a vnfm which has admin privilege. in a general case the user would not know the admin will migrate the instance ahead of time as you said.","commit_id":"fec048c5614b6d903fcb553810d068b29c1ca8a6"}]}