)]}'
{"neutron/tests/unit/common/ovn/test_hash_ring_manager.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":6773,"name":"Lucas Alvares Gomes","email":"lucasagomes@gmail.com","username":"lucasagomes"},"change_message_id":"de72dd9b4aaca8fb9a069cccd14d653ce5010336","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":37,"context_line":"        self.admin_ctx \u003d context.get_admin_context()"},{"line_number":38,"context_line":""},{"line_number":39,"context_line":"    def _verify_hashes(self, hash_dict):"},{"line_number":40,"context_line":"        for uuid_, target_node in hash_dict.items():"},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"            self.assertEqual(target_node,"},{"line_number":42,"context_line":"                             self.hash_ring_manager.get_node(uuid_))"},{"line_number":43,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"3fa7e38b_35e1efd0","line":40,"updated":"2019-12-16 09:31:23.000000000","message":"I don\u0027t know, it smells like something is wrong here. Maybe we need to investigate why this is inverted in the first place ?","commit_id":"b869f30e0b082d789c6668ec1a3ee69f2142798e"},{"author":{"_account_id":1131,"name":"Brian Haley","email":"haleyb.dev@gmail.com","username":"brian-haley"},"change_message_id":"863d47a09355f2336815f1fe2007a2d15be8d3f0","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":37,"context_line":"        self.admin_ctx \u003d context.get_admin_context()"},{"line_number":38,"context_line":""},{"line_number":39,"context_line":"    def _verify_hashes(self, hash_dict):"},{"line_number":40,"context_line":"        for uuid_, target_node in hash_dict.items():"},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"            self.assertEqual(target_node,"},{"line_number":42,"context_line":"                             self.hash_ring_manager.get_node(uuid_))"},{"line_number":43,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"3fa7e38b_dffc35b8","line":40,"in_reply_to":"3fa7e38b_35400f60","updated":"2019-12-16 14:00:54.000000000","message":"Lucas - thanks for confirming, when I first saw it I was thinking there might be a problem in the hash ring code itself","commit_id":"b869f30e0b082d789c6668ec1a3ee69f2142798e"},{"author":{"_account_id":6773,"name":"Lucas Alvares Gomes","email":"lucasagomes@gmail.com","username":"lucasagomes"},"change_message_id":"b7a1f5a2c48632099e37f1edd8ce2ab5282f07d6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":37,"context_line":"        self.admin_ctx \u003d context.get_admin_context()"},{"line_number":38,"context_line":""},{"line_number":39,"context_line":"    def _verify_hashes(self, hash_dict):"},{"line_number":40,"context_line":"        for uuid_, target_node in hash_dict.items():"},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"            self.assertEqual(target_node,"},{"line_number":42,"context_line":"                             self.hash_ring_manager.get_node(uuid_))"},{"line_number":43,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"3fa7e38b_35400f60","line":40,"in_reply_to":"3fa7e38b_35e1efd0","updated":"2019-12-16 09:50:32.000000000","message":"My bad, this is just for the testing code.\n\nYeah it makes more sense to have it the other way around, it was a programatic error before where we tried to include duplicated keys in the dict","commit_id":"b869f30e0b082d789c6668ec1a3ee69f2142798e"}]}