)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":32586,"name":"Elvira García Ruiz","display_name":"Elvira","email":"egarciar@redhat.com","username":"elvira"},"change_message_id":"2084b7254a391b7326af7c3604cbfff5c8a694d0","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"d0fb12a9_98471245","updated":"2023-07-11 15:43:42.000000000","message":"I checked the code base and did not see any other coincidence for the old set_quota_usage_dirty method. LGTM! \n\nJust to know more about this, did it came out related to any other bug or did you just realize you could simplify this?","commit_id":"2c0e9cfa718495f642c07a6b7e0979f5a450a5d6"},{"author":{"_account_id":16688,"name":"Rodolfo Alonso","email":"ralonsoh@redhat.com","username":"rodolfo-alonso-hernandez"},"change_message_id":"47bd9608edd0761d242ccdd301bd64aa652649be","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"78d7cf32_dc146a0b","in_reply_to":"d0fb12a9_98471245","updated":"2023-07-19 16:18:40.000000000","message":"I realized that when fixing a bug. \"set_quota_usage_dirty\" is redundant if we just use the second one (for multiple objects).","commit_id":"2c0e9cfa718495f642c07a6b7e0979f5a450a5d6"}]}