)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":1131,"name":"Brian Haley","email":"haleyb.dev@gmail.com","username":"brian-haley"},"change_message_id":"24ac7ad3fd0acf0540039ab8c1caad8776096912","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"9b8a2d4f_2a47f094","updated":"2024-12-03 20:39:00.000000000","message":"I would like to make a push for this to merge, as it is reliant on a config option to change the behavior. This way it will get into an LTS release that would have a later OVN version with the fix that is required there.","commit_id":"17541a43aa56878107a54b4658fb256c4432b38d"},{"author":{"_account_id":9656,"name":"Ihar Hrachyshka","email":"ihrachys@redhat.com","username":"ihrachys","status":"Red Hat Networking Systems Engineer"},"change_message_id":"ac1b7ae195bd3ea0776bf937820031a0641491e8","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"3394d933_6751d99f","updated":"2024-10-07 14:13:23.000000000","message":"Looks reasonable from technical backport execution perspective. This patch can be considered a feature work, but its effect is rather well isolated from the default case (no nested SNAT). I am not against merging it, though I\u0027d like others to chime in.","commit_id":"17541a43aa56878107a54b4658fb256c4432b38d"},{"author":{"_account_id":1131,"name":"Brian Haley","email":"haleyb.dev@gmail.com","username":"brian-haley"},"change_message_id":"88853157d5326a4096c27450129a37284fc3660c","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"391eeb7a_b2a5bda8","updated":"2025-01-24 23:12:40.000000000","message":"ping reviewers","commit_id":"17541a43aa56878107a54b4658fb256c4432b38d"}]}