)]}'
{"specs/liberty/approved/numa-node-pinning.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":5511,"name":"Nikola Dipanov","email":"ndipanov@redhat.com","username":"ndipanov"},"change_message_id":"77a394d3f8ab2f4e2adfc3e431e3ffcd2df3479e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":18,"context_line":"In order to allow this, the proposal is to allow explicitly specifying this"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"mapping via flavor extra specs of the form \"hw:numa_node.X \u003d Y\", or image"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"metadata of the form \"hw_numa_node.X\u003dY\" where X is the integer numa node in"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"the guest, and Y is the integer numa node on the host."},{"line_number":22,"context_line":""},{"line_number":23,"context_line":"APIImpact"},{"line_number":24,"context_line":"Implements blueprint numa-node-pinning"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":3,"id":"bab921fb_2327a6cb","line":21,"updated":"2015-04-24 17:14:07.000000000","message":"I am really not a fan of this - I think this is too low level of detail to be exposed to the users in an IaaS cloud TBH. See below for a suggestion.\n\nWith the original NUMA and CPU pinning work, we really tried hard to make the semantics exposed to users as cloudy as possible, without exposing low level hardware details. I feel that this would be a regression in that regard.","commit_id":"d33580380d669176b9569edaf463d28decfc4345"},{"author":{"_account_id":5511,"name":"Nikola Dipanov","email":"ndipanov@redhat.com","username":"ndipanov"},"change_message_id":"77a394d3f8ab2f4e2adfc3e431e3ffcd2df3479e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":37,"context_line":"For high-performance guests to make use of these services the software in the"},{"line_number":38,"context_line":"guest should allocate memory from the same host NUMA node as the underlying"},{"line_number":39,"context_line":"host services/hardware.  This requires that the relevant guest NUMA nodes be"},{"line_number":40,"context_line":"explicitly mapped to the desired host NUMA nodes."},{"line_number":41,"context_line":""},{"line_number":42,"context_line":"Project Priority"},{"line_number":43,"context_line":"-----------------"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":3,"id":"bab921fb_834e7294","line":40,"updated":"2015-04-24 17:14:07.000000000","message":"How about if we find a way to expose if hosts do in fact provide such services, and then have a way to request to be placed on the host with such service, while taking into account the host NUMA node the service is on (similar to how PCI devices work now and any other resources really)","commit_id":"d33580380d669176b9569edaf463d28decfc4345"}]}