)]}'
{"specs/liberty/approved/cells-host-mapping.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":5441,"name":"Andrew Laski","email":"andrew@lascii.com","username":"alaski"},"change_message_id":"7c1a55c8ce18f9b9fffb494db996131bc959b533","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":55,"context_line":"             |          |           |"},{"line_number":56,"context_line":"             v          v           |"},{"line_number":57,"context_line":"        host_mapping  cell_mapping  |"},{"line_number":58,"context_line":"    "},{"line_number":59,"context_line":""},{"line_number":60,"context_line":""},{"line_number":61,"context_line":"Alternatives"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"9a0c5dc1_2f30d2e7","line":58,"updated":"2015-05-13 20:50:51.000000000","message":"Test failure is this, will be fixed.","commit_id":"2cd9f4903016c44690c42eeee39512f853f037ab"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"49580b9dafdde28d4119215128271b5e32d4d784","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":54,"context_line":"                 +----+                   |"},{"line_number":55,"context_line":"                      |                   |"},{"line_number":56,"context_line":"                      v                   |"},{"line_number":57,"context_line":" host_mapping (joined with) cell_mapping  |"},{"line_number":58,"context_line":""},{"line_number":59,"context_line":""},{"line_number":60,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"7a016987_fddc96e5","line":57,"updated":"2015-05-18 17:32:05.000000000","message":"So, this is fine, but I think we should be able to optimize what we get back from the scheduler to potentially avoid having to do this extra query. If not, then this is okay. I\u0027m happy looking at this in the code review phase.","commit_id":"b427a33326d6ff37c50a1efa8f314fcc5b13a315"},{"author":{"_account_id":7166,"name":"Sylvain Bauza","email":"sbauza@redhat.com","username":"sbauza"},"change_message_id":"bf74322368aa2c8a4e9a634bb41f6659602f6f75","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":54,"context_line":"                 +----+                   |"},{"line_number":55,"context_line":"                      |                   |"},{"line_number":56,"context_line":"                      v                   |"},{"line_number":57,"context_line":" host_mapping (joined with) cell_mapping  |"},{"line_number":58,"context_line":""},{"line_number":59,"context_line":""},{"line_number":60,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"7a016987_f615d03f","line":57,"in_reply_to":"7a016987_fddc96e5","updated":"2015-05-19 00:12:13.000000000","message":"There is still an on-going discussion about if the select_dests() calls should get back the (host, node) tuple or a more nicer (cell, host, node)\n\nSince the cell is just something related to a compute node, we can leave the query done here like Andrew said, but that\u0027s not really a problem to provide the latter tuple if needed really.","commit_id":"b427a33326d6ff37c50a1efa8f314fcc5b13a315"},{"author":{"_account_id":7166,"name":"Sylvain Bauza","email":"sbauza@redhat.com","username":"sbauza"},"change_message_id":"bf74322368aa2c8a4e9a634bb41f6659602f6f75","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":61,"context_line":"Alternatives"},{"line_number":62,"context_line":"------------"},{"line_number":63,"context_line":""},{"line_number":64,"context_line":"We could continue to use the nova-cells model in place today."},{"line_number":65,"context_line":""},{"line_number":66,"context_line":"Data model impact"},{"line_number":67,"context_line":"-----------------"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"7a016987_d612d456","line":64,"updated":"2015-05-19 00:12:13.000000000","message":"Eh","commit_id":"b427a33326d6ff37c50a1efa8f314fcc5b13a315"}]}