)]}'
{"specs/config-kvm-driver-for-pci-devices.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":1779,"name":"Daniel Berrange","email":"berrange@redhat.com","username":"berrange"},"change_message_id":"66733ddb6734624a240df955a166549aa1ff6552","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":53,"context_line":"It is possible to specify the driver name when generating the libvirt XML for "},{"line_number":54,"context_line":"a guest (name can be \"vfio\" or \"kvm\" for legacy PCI device assignment method). "},{"line_number":55,"context_line":"The solution only needs to detect which driver needs to be used and specify it "},{"line_number":56,"context_line":"in the XML."},{"line_number":57,"context_line":""},{"line_number":58,"context_line":"The issue was raised in a launchpad bug."},{"line_number":59,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3a29b11f_5293bf4f","line":56,"updated":"2015-10-25 15:02:32.000000000","message":"Hmm, if the legacy \"kvm\" driver for PCI device assignment is allowing something that VFIO is forbidding, then this is either a bug in VFIO or a bug in the legacy KVM driver. They are supposed to implement exactly the same rules for deciding which groups of devices can be used together. So that inconsistent logic between kvm \u0026 vfio needs fixing so they both behave the same way,\n\nIOW, having nova change the driver used is a viable solution.","commit_id":"2d8cedc31f4ab436224fe4f5054aff204d18eb6b"},{"author":{"_account_id":8768,"name":"Chris Friesen","email":"chris.friesen@windriver.com","username":"cbf123"},"change_message_id":"940cd99a2953f94b598885480aad99e7613c5712","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":53,"context_line":"It is possible to specify the driver name when generating the libvirt XML for "},{"line_number":54,"context_line":"a guest (name can be \"vfio\" or \"kvm\" for legacy PCI device assignment method). "},{"line_number":55,"context_line":"The solution only needs to detect which driver needs to be used and specify it "},{"line_number":56,"context_line":"in the XML."},{"line_number":57,"context_line":""},{"line_number":58,"context_line":"The issue was raised in a launchpad bug."},{"line_number":59,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"3a29b11f_39f8557c","line":56,"in_reply_to":"3a29b11f_5293bf4f","updated":"2015-10-26 16:36:57.000000000","message":"Is that supposed to be \"...is not a viable solution...\"?  Otherwise I can\u0027t figure out the -1.","commit_id":"2d8cedc31f4ab436224fe4f5054aff204d18eb6b"}]}