)]}'
{"specs/pike/approved/resource-provider-traits.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":10202,"name":"Wan-yen Hsu","email":"wanyenhsu@gmail.com"},"change_message_id":"ae49b661c733a01e3211eb5b1f79384727846de2","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":30,"context_line":"request 80GB of disk space for an instance (quantitative), but may also expect"},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"that the disk be SSD instead of spinning disk (qualitative). Having a way to"},{"line_number":32,"context_line":"mark that a storage provider (it can be a shared storage or compute node\u0027s"},{"line_number":33,"context_line":"attached storage) is SSD or spinning is what we are concerned with."},{"line_number":34,"context_line":""},{"line_number":35,"context_line":"Many traits are defined in a standard way by OpenStack, such as the Intel CPU"},{"line_number":36,"context_line":"instruction set extensions. These are reported programmatically, and will be"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"1a1ced50_aa5eb973","side":"PARENT","line":33,"updated":"2017-03-20 21:59:02.000000000","message":"Question- If a compute node has both spinning disks and SSDs,   How to report the available storage capacity? Should it base on the total capacity of spanning disks and SSDs?  How to specify the required capacities for SSD and spinning disk?  A node may have total of 80GB disk space but only 20 GB is SSD.  In this scenario, how can a user specify what SSD capacity is needed?","commit_id":"75e5e7e85d1c30425a42dac1d22998ddfab80ce1"},{"author":{"_account_id":5754,"name":"Alex Xu","email":"hejie.xu@intel.com","username":"xuhj"},"change_message_id":"2a8b90503053da71cf8a955ee4651c8d59f7e80a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":30,"context_line":"request 80GB of disk space for an instance (quantitative), but may also expect"},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"that the disk be SSD instead of spinning disk (qualitative). Having a way to"},{"line_number":32,"context_line":"mark that a storage provider (it can be a shared storage or compute node\u0027s"},{"line_number":33,"context_line":"attached storage) is SSD or spinning is what we are concerned with."},{"line_number":34,"context_line":""},{"line_number":35,"context_line":"Many traits are defined in a standard way by OpenStack, such as the Intel CPU"},{"line_number":36,"context_line":"instruction set extensions. These are reported programmatically, and will be"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"1a1ced50_887512cc","side":"PARENT","line":33,"in_reply_to":"1a1ced50_aa5eb973","updated":"2017-03-23 06:32:35.000000000","message":"@Wan-yen, yea, this patch just fix the typo. But I can answer your question.\n\nIn the real world, the compute node only can connect one type storage nova. But if we think about the future, we have different type storage connect to compute node, then we will have different resource provider for different storage. So at that time, we should have one RP for spinning disks and one RP for SSDs.","commit_id":"75e5e7e85d1c30425a42dac1d22998ddfab80ce1"},{"author":{"_account_id":6167,"name":"Ken\u0027ichi Ohmichi","email":"ken1ohmichi@gmail.com","username":"oomichi"},"change_message_id":"ade8f825f5ce3fb06a232cd83b6c1730fcf28256","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":30,"context_line":"request 80GB of disk space for an instance (quantitative), but may also expect"},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"that the disk be SSD instead of spinning disk (qualitative). Having a way to"},{"line_number":32,"context_line":"mark that a storage provider (it can be a shared storage or compute node\u0027s"},{"line_number":33,"context_line":"attached storage) is SSD or spinning is what we are concerned with."},{"line_number":34,"context_line":""},{"line_number":35,"context_line":"Many traits are defined in a standard way by OpenStack, such as the Intel CPU"},{"line_number":36,"context_line":"instruction set extensions. These are reported programmatically, and will be"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"1a1ced50_2cbfe0aa","side":"PARENT","line":33,"in_reply_to":"1a1ced50_aa5eb973","updated":"2017-03-22 20:54:12.000000000","message":"This patch doesn\u0027t add this section at all, and it just fixes typos. The question with -1 is not accurate on reviews because of the patch scope.","commit_id":"75e5e7e85d1c30425a42dac1d22998ddfab80ce1"}]}