)]}'
{"specs/pike/approved/support-volume-type-with-bdm-parameter.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":2759,"name":"Huang Zhiteng","email":"winston.d@gmail.com","username":"zhiteng-huang"},"change_message_id":"8e70e11bbcf35b624d716dab2108e9b57cf3c8c6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":97,"context_line":"Performance Impact"},{"line_number":98,"context_line":"------------------"},{"line_number":99,"context_line":""},{"line_number":100,"context_line":"There will be subtle performance impact because additional call to cinder"},{"line_number":101,"context_line":"to validate the volume_type passed in actually exists."},{"line_number":102,"context_line":""},{"line_number":103,"context_line":""},{"line_number":104,"context_line":"Other deployer impact"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"ff0f0b1f_569f775e","line":101,"range":{"start_line":100,"start_character":0,"end_line":101,"end_character":54},"updated":"2017-05-22 06:29:58.000000000","message":"There doesn\u0027t have to be an extra Cinder API call in order to support specifying volume type for boot volume, therefore I think it\u0027s OK to assume there won\u0027t be any performance impact.","commit_id":"4a08d1effc9c9d219e247eac43cb1a714419e7b7"}]}