)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"3804eaa2e0cc5c02066cc45329b694b396800736","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":12,"context_line":"other cores had several concerns with the direction of this spec,"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"Both in terms of is this in the scope of nova and"},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"if it is, is this the correct way to support passing fqdn/dns_domain"},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"info to the gust vs the other abandoned approach."},{"line_number":16,"context_line":""},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"As such we should follow the reverts-for-retrospective-vetos policy"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/policies.html#reverts-for-retrospective-vetos"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":2,"id":"79dcebcb_25a84e11","line":15,"updated":"2022-07-19 13:10:26.000000000","message":"...and it was proposed and merged in under 24 hours, so there wasn\u0027t even time to air those concerns.","commit_id":"aaad3b4e26fd12e474e0645d1054200ba0277f0d"}]}