)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":35307,"name":"Taketani Ryo","email":"taketani.ryo@fujitsu.com","username":"r-taketn0517"},"change_message_id":"7bf27191dc33d02b718c644c3b10684a972e9a12","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"2e1866ee_84b53029","updated":"2024-12-27 03:24:27.000000000","message":"still some sections are incomplete.\n* libvirt URL\n* Limitations and Non-limitations","commit_id":"9c11c43a47472f547f1eb09590c2c057a86c70f4"},{"author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"change_message_id":"ae1bacc06b82e550d48d23c07cf9834aad23ea64","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"bbef6905_6db87686","updated":"2025-01-08 14:20:47.000000000","message":"Plenty of things are unknown or in flight for this. Also it depends on `AMD SEV-ES feature \u003chttps://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/2025.1/approved/amd-sev-es-libvirt-support.html\u003e` So I suggest to defer this to the next cycle to allow the SEV-ES work to progress as well as libvirt support to appear. Otherwise the proposal does not seem to be controversial to me as it follows the direction we approved for SEV-ES already. -1 is for visibility","commit_id":"ee75a0677b97824dbb6cf3ea7fab4d8e3dec0186"},{"author":{"_account_id":35307,"name":"Taketani Ryo","email":"taketani.ryo@fujitsu.com","username":"r-taketn0517"},"change_message_id":"46dfe929a9ab1cc11a64b5be0e990af716f44ab8","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"cb494704_331ed630","in_reply_to":"bbef6905_6db87686","updated":"2025-02-07 11:14:34.000000000","message":"I\u0027ll resubmit a spec in the 2025.2 directory and close this review.","commit_id":"ee75a0677b97824dbb6cf3ea7fab4d8e3dec0186"}],"specs/2025.1/approved/arm-cca-libvirt-support.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"change_message_id":"ae1bacc06b82e550d48d23c07cf9834aad23ea64","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":293,"context_line":"* Recent versions of the hypervisor software stack which all support\r"},{"line_number":294,"context_line":"  CCA, as detailed in `Other deployer impact`_ above.\r"},{"line_number":295,"context_line":"\r"},{"line_number":296,"context_line":"\r"},{"line_number":297,"context_line":"Testing\r"},{"line_number":298,"context_line":"\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\r"},{"line_number":299,"context_line":"\r"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"fd0efc83_c30eda3e","line":296,"updated":"2025-01-08 14:20:47.000000000","message":"As far as I see   `AMD SEV-ES feature \u003chttps://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/2025.1/approved/amd-sev-es-libvirt-support.html\u003e`_.\nis also a hard dependency as this proposal relies on the fact that such work is done and the provider tree is reshaped with nested RPs already.","commit_id":"ee75a0677b97824dbb6cf3ea7fab4d8e3dec0186"}]}