)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":16207,"name":"ribaudr","display_name":"uggla","email":"rene.ribaud@gmail.com","username":"uggla","status":"Red Hat"},"change_message_id":"e4aca450d4f99dee21f7a515f404cc5f17647213","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"e2c1d267_0360c41e","updated":"2025-05-14 09:31:03.000000000","message":"Hi Stephen,\nCould you please create the associated BP and add it in the commit msg.","commit_id":"48896a790761e51b8d6d7df37693e4d7a56e5031"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"9c1863efdf634dca0d051bef983a7af462011e2e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"f5bbabd9_9a1de892","updated":"2025-04-16 10:15:50.000000000","message":"i spoke to stephen about this in person too and i fully agree with them\n\nits not documented and i belive we have little to no direct testing of this.\n\nas we have no definition of how this should diverge (its apprently a direct alias but may have had diffent beahivor in the past) i think we are better off removing this.","commit_id":"48896a790761e51b8d6d7df37693e4d7a56e5031"},{"author":{"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},"change_message_id":"ec5cea2831ab08a428785ef47941dd4a8b339287","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"3bbad21c_e02e3507","in_reply_to":"e2c1d267_0360c41e","updated":"2025-05-19 12:59:23.000000000","message":"Done.","commit_id":"48896a790761e51b8d6d7df37693e4d7a56e5031"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"53c9fa7bdcc7c6118310f7604cdcb8aa83b61fa4","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"82941ac0_6d0fb0e2","updated":"2025-05-29 20:13:06.000000000","message":"I am really surprise about this API :). I agree with the proposal and do with the microversion.","commit_id":"44e72e350214dc6d8063f3f34f027bba3157de69"}],"specs/2025.2/approved/remove-os-volumes_boot-api.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"53c9fa7bdcc7c6118310f7604cdcb8aa83b61fa4","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":30,"context_line":"Proposed change"},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d"},{"line_number":32,"context_line":""},{"line_number":33,"context_line":"The ``/os-volumes_boot`` API and child APIs will be modified so that it returns"},{"line_number":34,"context_line":"``HTTP 410 (Gone)`` for all resources starting from a new API microversion."},{"line_number":35,"context_line":"While the API will continue to work for older microversions, we will mark"},{"line_number":36,"context_line":"the method with the ``nova.api.openstack.wsgi.removed`` decorator to indicate"},{"line_number":37,"context_line":"that automatic client and documentation generation tooling should ignore the"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":3,"id":"6b5390b8_e22f9d15","line":34,"range":{"start_line":33,"start_character":0,"end_line":34,"end_character":75},"updated":"2025-05-29 20:13:06.000000000","message":"++. I agree, Though we have not published API anywhere but as endpoint exist, there might be someone using it and I see API contract is what code behave even doc are missing. For safer side, I agree to 410 these with microversion.\n\nWe did microversion bump for all proxy APIs also, and doing same for this alias make sense.","commit_id":"44e72e350214dc6d8063f3f34f027bba3157de69"}]}