)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"change_message_id":"2f3ba01452700081a065f62595360aba43471e84","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"f46106d9_3a7034fe","updated":"2026-09-28 14:47:48.000000000","message":"I would love to have a functional reproducer where the test simulates that libvirt reports the device removed and then later reports the device re added. This unit test while probably correct in triggering the bug it is not showing the scenario that actually happens in real deployment.","commit_id":"c0726edfea3d1a4838dff9dfc64dd0e9e34152a6"},{"author":{"_account_id":8313,"name":"Lajos Katona","display_name":"lajoskatona","email":"katonalala@gmail.com","username":"elajkat","status":"Ericsson Software Technology"},"change_message_id":"c67d94f162ce9abe26d0d2da854c8246aff6897f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"3c8382bb_b303459d","in_reply_to":"f46106d9_3a7034fe","updated":"2026-09-29 15:13:09.000000000","message":"+1, I have to update the bug also as with more downstream testing I can clarify that also, and that makes easier I hope to add more a relevant functional reproducer for it","commit_id":"c0726edfea3d1a4838dff9dfc64dd0e9e34152a6"}]}