)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"c94f6a3c6f90179b6644813b87d17253431da7bf","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"dd65aa55_12a791e2","updated":"2026-10-05 17:10:53.000000000","message":"Pinning this ahead of the whole stack so we don\u0027t land anything until we\u0027ve finished review of the approach\n\nNOTE to reviewers starting the series from here: This is very much a POC. Missing tests in a lot of places, generated tests I haven\u0027t reviewed closely in plenty of other cases. This was focused on finding the sharp edges so we could have conversations about them. This works for me in real life but obviously I haven\u0027t covered all the scenarios and this deserves plenty of scrutiny.\n\nHack job osc modification to allow driving this in its current form is here:\n\nhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/1008846","commit_id":"bfaabda294f2432bf306880f0866a1f98b1bf821"}]}
