)]}'
{"doc/source/testing/libvirt-numa.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":5511,"name":"Nikola Dipanov","email":"ndipanov@redhat.com","username":"ndipanov"},"change_message_id":"81694dc2316fb14e0ef7a43fb0804748115de11a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":381,"context_line":"    \u003ctopology sockets\u003d\u00274\u0027 cores\u003d\u00271\u0027 threads\u003d\u00271\u0027/\u003e"},{"line_number":382,"context_line":"    \u003cnuma\u003e"},{"line_number":383,"context_line":"      \u003ccell id\u003d\u00270\u0027 cpus\u003d\u00270-1\u0027 memory\u003d\u0027524288\u0027/\u003e"},{"line_number":384,"context_line":"      \u003ccell id\u003d\u00271\u0027 cpus\u003d\u00272-3\u0027 memory\u003d\u0027524288\u0027/\u003e"},{"line_number":385,"context_line":"    \u003c/numa\u003e"},{"line_number":386,"context_line":"  \u003c/cpu\u003e"},{"line_number":387,"context_line":"  ..."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":3,"id":"3afb71cf_48563fcf","side":"PARENT","line":384,"updated":"2015-06-09 10:07:18.000000000","message":"Right so this stuff was just a docs bug not related to the internal format.","commit_id":"93cbba96fa3d92ce1a853516171dcf69a3ec3984"},{"author":{"_account_id":5511,"name":"Nikola Dipanov","email":"ndipanov@redhat.com","username":"ndipanov"},"change_message_id":"81694dc2316fb14e0ef7a43fb0804748115de11a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":182,"context_line":""},{"line_number":183,"context_line":".. code-block:: bash"},{"line_number":184,"context_line":""},{"line_number":185,"context_line":"  # . openrc admin"},{"line_number":186,"context_line":"  # nova boot --image cirros-0.3.2-x86_64-uec --flavor m1.tiny cirros1"},{"line_number":187,"context_line":""},{"line_number":188,"context_line":"The host will be reporting NUMA topology, but there should only"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":3,"id":"3afb71cf_bd561328","line":185,"updated":"2015-06-09 10:07:18.000000000","message":"this is the same I think but no matter","commit_id":"e11dab257f25ef80769ea3568a7a289c754ea017"},{"author":{"_account_id":5511,"name":"Nikola Dipanov","email":"ndipanov@redhat.com","username":"ndipanov"},"change_message_id":"81694dc2316fb14e0ef7a43fb0804748115de11a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":467,"context_line":"  ..."},{"line_number":468,"context_line":""},{"line_number":469,"context_line":"This example shows that the guest has been locked to the 3rd NUMA"},{"line_number":470,"context_line":"node (which contains pCPUs 6 and 7). Note that there is no explicit"},{"line_number":471,"context_line":"NUMA topology listed in the guest XML."},{"line_number":472,"context_line":""},{"line_number":473,"context_line":"------------------------------------------------"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":3,"id":"3afb71cf_e8dccb74","line":470,"updated":"2015-06-09 10:07:18.000000000","message":"So this is not related to this patch - but after this (hint: pls review :)) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188468/ it will no longer be true (instances with no numa will be allowed to float over all cpus).\n\nIt is unclear that we want to move to all intances having an impicit numa topology of one cell so might be best to remove this section for the time being (in a separate patch maybe)","commit_id":"e11dab257f25ef80769ea3568a7a289c754ea017"},{"author":{"_account_id":5511,"name":"Nikola Dipanov","email":"ndipanov@redhat.com","username":"ndipanov"},"change_message_id":"81694dc2316fb14e0ef7a43fb0804748115de11a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":528,"context_line":"* The guest has been given a virtual NUMA topology"},{"line_number":529,"context_line":"  with a single node holding all RAM and CPUs"},{"line_number":530,"context_line":"* The guest NUMA node has been strictly pinned to"},{"line_number":531,"context_line":"  a host NUMA node."},{"line_number":532,"context_line":""},{"line_number":533,"context_line":"As a further sanity test, check what Nova recorded for the"},{"line_number":534,"context_line":"instance in the database. This should match the \u003cnumatune\u003e"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":3,"id":"3afb71cf_09d4c9e9","line":531,"updated":"2015-06-09 10:07:18.000000000","message":"Might be worth pointing out that this information is visible in the \u0027id\u0027 of the cell dict, and it corresponds to the host id of the cell.","commit_id":"e11dab257f25ef80769ea3568a7a289c754ea017"}]}