)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":7166,"name":"Sylvain Bauza","email":"sbauza@redhat.com","username":"sbauza"},"change_message_id":"c7b107ecb284c9ac894d2592c362582b38369876","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":11,"context_line":"validation denies it because there is not API parameter definition"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"and it didn\u0027t work at all."},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"This patch adds the API schema for enabling different_cell filter on"},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"v2.1 API."},{"line_number":15,"context_line":""},{"line_number":16,"context_line":"Change-Id: Ic61b9a18722b7701b09e71f3f3a547ad9e6363c2"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"Closes-Bug: #1492925"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":3,"id":"da20952f_b9c7d643","line":14,"updated":"2015-09-07 14:34:05.000000000","message":"Since it\u0027s a Medium bug blocking the use of v2.1 for Cells, I\u0027d rather decouple that change from the whole series, and just amend the existing scheduler_hints schema by adding the key","commit_id":"d9447394f2f2f2465c457480a3be397bd02fbcc1"},{"author":{"_account_id":6167,"name":"Ken\u0027ichi Ohmichi","email":"ken1ohmichi@gmail.com","username":"oomichi"},"change_message_id":"1da71dea77f1fef889f29e15690a8e56418ddb0e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":11,"context_line":"validation denies it because there is not API parameter definition"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"and it didn\u0027t work at all."},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"This patch adds the API schema for enabling different_cell filter on"},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"v2.1 API."},{"line_number":15,"context_line":""},{"line_number":16,"context_line":"Change-Id: Ic61b9a18722b7701b09e71f3f3a547ad9e6363c2"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"Closes-Bug: #1492925"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":3,"id":"da20952f_d0f37007","line":14,"in_reply_to":"da20952f_b9c7d643","updated":"2015-09-08 02:49:34.000000000","message":"Done","commit_id":"d9447394f2f2f2465c457480a3be397bd02fbcc1"}],"nova/api/openstack/compute/schemas/scheduler_hints.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":7166,"name":"Sylvain Bauza","email":"sbauza@redhat.com","username":"sbauza"},"change_message_id":"655fae7783bfe0429ced55aa9ca6164c6167d5f6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":51,"context_line":"            \u0027items\u0027: {"},{"line_number":52,"context_line":"                \u0027type\u0027: \u0027string\u0027"},{"line_number":53,"context_line":"            }"},{"line_number":54,"context_line":"        },"},{"line_number":55,"context_line":"        \u0027build_near_host_ip\u0027: parameter_types.ip_address,"},{"line_number":56,"context_line":"        \u0027cidr\u0027: {"},{"line_number":57,"context_line":"            \u0027type\u0027: \u0027string\u0027,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":4,"id":"da20952f_64d64129","line":54,"updated":"2015-09-08 19:21:36.000000000","message":"Thanks to a nice alaski\u0027s point on IRC, what happened previously ? Were we silently ignoring the hint if provided and returning still a 202, or were we failing if the hint was provided ?","commit_id":"5e95eb8f1375d8900ed822e4532d89ed340cbf23"},{"author":{"_account_id":7166,"name":"Sylvain Bauza","email":"sbauza@redhat.com","username":"sbauza"},"change_message_id":"f7350dcbe76efd4d866b1964c92380fc467d3ae1","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":51,"context_line":"            \u0027items\u0027: {"},{"line_number":52,"context_line":"                \u0027type\u0027: \u0027string\u0027"},{"line_number":53,"context_line":"            }"},{"line_number":54,"context_line":"        },"},{"line_number":55,"context_line":"        \u0027build_near_host_ip\u0027: parameter_types.ip_address,"},{"line_number":56,"context_line":"        \u0027cidr\u0027: {"},{"line_number":57,"context_line":"            \u0027type\u0027: \u0027string\u0027,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":6,"id":"da20952f_80345c4a","line":54,"updated":"2015-09-10 08:26:04.000000000","message":"I think the benefits of backing that change to all the current microversions (by implicitely not providing a version bump which would prevent the previous versions to have the fix) win against the drawback of potentially changing behaviour for a specific version.\n\nTo be concise, since there is an additionalProperties set to False, it meant that the filter was broken for older API versions, we have to assume to backport the fix to all versions.\n\nIMHO, that\u0027s a total different story (fixing a bug) from the one that consists of adding a new hint for a new filter - and the latter has to be discussed in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/221642/","commit_id":"23a1221c54b4d23ba884e50b0efb38ede94c430c"}]}