)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":7166,"name":"Sylvain Bauza","email":"sbauza@redhat.com","username":"sbauza"},"change_message_id":"078cdaedd61ad5940ddae363872d2c24be08f091","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"Old compute nodes didn\u0027t have \u0027host\u0027 field. Remove now"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"backward compatibility and tests for old compute nodes in"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"\u0027get_by_host_and_nodename\u0027 and \u0027get_all_by_host\u0027 functions."},{"line_number":12,"context_line":""},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"Change-Id: I5e1e0892dee56f99f07a429af978c1b48b1450bd"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":3,"id":"9a68dd71_67c41340","line":11,"updated":"2016-01-20 20:22:06.000000000","message":"To be clear, you should comment that the host field was provided by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126372/19/ which was merged in Liberty so the backwards compatibility was for Kilo compute nodes. \n\nSince we only accept to have rolling backwards for only one cycle, it means that now we\u0027re in Mitaka, we can remove that.\n\n\nCould you please explain that in the commit msg?","commit_id":"0c0f3c4adf156e1867233a2314623576cb37b76f"}]}