)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":7166,"name":"Sylvain Bauza","email":"sbauza@redhat.com","username":"sbauza"},"change_message_id":"bfdb406e0306131c499ffc6083a56b6797eb0c8d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":17,"context_line":"exception as either InvalidDiskInfo (in qemu_img_info) or"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"ImageUnacceptable (in convert_image and fetch_to_raw) and makes the"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"manager accept this as a cause for a BuildAbortException on the"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"logic that if the image is bad, things are dire, let\u0027s bail."},{"line_number":21,"context_line":""},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"Based on the code in qemu_img_info it appears there was a"},{"line_number":23,"context_line":"misunderstanding of how process_utils.execute behaves so it seems"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":4,"id":"fa69d971_87d975f5","line":20,"range":{"start_line":20,"start_character":6,"end_line":20,"end_character":60},"updated":"2016-01-11 14:50:21.000000000","message":"I agree with the logic. If the image is bad, there is no need to reschedule IMHO. Since we\u0027re cloud, just fire again a new request.","commit_id":"9a4ecfd96dad32fd4726c46dc6d89e956f1f2a29"}]}