)]}'
{"nova/tests/fixtures.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"56397384b85e4a79bced7497edbaed97c18effad","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":344,"context_line":"    def serialize_context(self, context):"},{"line_number":345,"context_line":"        \"\"\"Serialize context with the db_connection inside.\"\"\""},{"line_number":346,"context_line":"        values \u003d context.to_dict()"},{"line_number":347,"context_line":"        values[\u0027db_connection\u0027] \u003d context.db_connection"},{"line_number":348,"context_line":"        return values"},{"line_number":349,"context_line":""},{"line_number":350,"context_line":"    def deserialize_context(self, values):"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"fa31d9ce_d576b4a2","line":347,"range":{"start_line":347,"start_character":16,"end_line":347,"end_character":29},"updated":"2017-02-16 00:18:44.000000000","message":"Note that we could make this more obviously just a test hack by namespacing the key to something like:\n\n key \u003d \"db_connection\"\n \"_nova_local_tests_only_%s\" % key","commit_id":"b850f2c28ce654c21cbabdb307d9d1a37a7e4926"},{"author":{"_account_id":6873,"name":"Matt Riedemann","email":"mriedem.os@gmail.com","username":"mriedem"},"change_message_id":"b55fe722849508f5d9030acbea303f15e8567985","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":334,"context_line":"    \"\"\"A messaging.RequestContextSerializer that helps with cells."},{"line_number":335,"context_line":""},{"line_number":336,"context_line":"    Our normal serializer does not pass in the context like db_connection"},{"line_number":337,"context_line":"    and transport_url, for good reason. We don\u0027t really want/need to"},{"line_number":338,"context_line":"    force a remote RPC server to use our values for this. However,"},{"line_number":339,"context_line":"    during unit and functional tests, since we\u0027re all in the same"},{"line_number":340,"context_line":"    process, we want cell-targeted RPC calls to preserve these values."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":7,"id":"da36d5c6_242cbd01","line":337,"range":{"start_line":337,"start_character":4,"end_line":337,"end_character":21},"updated":"2017-02-22 15:33:22.000000000","message":"Did you want to be handling this too? You\u0027re only handling db_connection below.","commit_id":"cc92ed14c3deca341382744765faa1f1d2243e73"},{"author":{"_account_id":7166,"name":"Sylvain Bauza","email":"sbauza@redhat.com","username":"sbauza"},"change_message_id":"e03bc2cbe6692c0cfec0159772667954946554e1","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":334,"context_line":"    \"\"\"A messaging.RequestContextSerializer that helps with cells."},{"line_number":335,"context_line":""},{"line_number":336,"context_line":"    Our normal serializer does not pass in the context like db_connection"},{"line_number":337,"context_line":"    and transport_url, for good reason. We don\u0027t really want/need to"},{"line_number":338,"context_line":"    force a remote RPC server to use our values for this. However,"},{"line_number":339,"context_line":"    during unit and functional tests, since we\u0027re all in the same"},{"line_number":340,"context_line":"    process, we want cell-targeted RPC calls to preserve these values."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":7,"id":"da36d5c6_3d1690a7","line":337,"range":{"start_line":337,"start_character":4,"end_line":337,"end_character":21},"in_reply_to":"da36d5c6_242cbd01","updated":"2017-02-22 16:32:30.000000000","message":"I guess that for the moment, we don\u0027t need to persist it IIUC.","commit_id":"cc92ed14c3deca341382744765faa1f1d2243e73"}]}
