)]}'
{"nova/db/sqlalchemy/migrate_repo/versions/150_havana.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":1653,"name":"garyk","email":"gkotton@vmware.com","username":"garyk"},"change_message_id":"0b68691662c64ff8e15b8013dc975fa41773a56e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":37,"context_line":""},{"line_number":38,"context_line":""},{"line_number":39,"context_line":"def Inet():"},{"line_number":40,"context_line":"    return String(length\u003d43).with_variant(dialects.postgresql.INET(),"},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"                  \u0027postgresql\u0027)"},{"line_number":42,"context_line":""},{"line_number":43,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":7,"id":"AAAATn%2F90lw%3D","line":40,"updated":"2013-12-05 15:24:50.000000000","message":"minor nit - the maximum length of an ipv6 address with ip v4 tunnels is 45. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/166132/maximum-length-of-the-textual-representation-of-an-ipv6-address","commit_id":"817baeb9374c66bd5c1fc7a60810335bf9e9338d"},{"author":{"_account_id":1653,"name":"garyk","email":"gkotton@vmware.com","username":"garyk"},"change_message_id":"5db00b88039bc438fb113f023b6b552582b65629","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":37,"context_line":""},{"line_number":38,"context_line":""},{"line_number":39,"context_line":"def Inet():"},{"line_number":40,"context_line":"    return String(length\u003d43).with_variant(dialects.postgresql.INET(),"},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"                  \u0027postgresql\u0027)"},{"line_number":42,"context_line":""},{"line_number":43,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":7,"id":"AAAATn%2F90iI%3D","line":40,"in_reply_to":"AAAATn%2F90kc%3D","updated":"2013-12-05 15:34:11.000000000","message":"Thanks for the clarification","commit_id":"817baeb9374c66bd5c1fc7a60810335bf9e9338d"},{"author":{"_account_id":360,"name":"Dan Prince","email":"dprince@redhat.com","username":"dan-prince"},"change_message_id":"bea3d81884cb2ca2ad8ba4d9068199e7b04a086b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":37,"context_line":""},{"line_number":38,"context_line":""},{"line_number":39,"context_line":"def Inet():"},{"line_number":40,"context_line":"    return String(length\u003d43).with_variant(dialects.postgresql.INET(),"},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"                  \u0027postgresql\u0027)"},{"line_number":42,"context_line":""},{"line_number":43,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":7,"id":"AAAATn%2F90kc%3D","line":40,"in_reply_to":"AAAATn%2F90lw%3D","updated":"2013-12-05 15:28:39.000000000","message":"What I\u0027m doing here is compacting the existing Nova migrations for Grizzly/Havana. So essentially the value (length) here needs to match what we\u0027ve already done. If we want to increase the length of this field further the thing to do would be to add a new Icehouse migration to do just that. (perhaps filing a bug, etc too).\n\nThe short answer is we can\u0027t just change the length here in this commit because it would cause potentially upgrade issues.","commit_id":"817baeb9374c66bd5c1fc7a60810335bf9e9338d"}]}