)]}'
{"nova/compute/manager.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":7,"name":"Jay Pipes","email":"jaypipes@gmail.com","username":"jaypipes"},"change_message_id":"57495ca3996039fec5004991d178cd942519444e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":4125,"context_line":"            # against other providers that need to be held by the migration"},{"line_number":4126,"context_line":"            # as well. Perhaps something like shared storage resources that"},{"line_number":4127,"context_line":"            # will actually be duplicated during a resize type operation."},{"line_number":4128,"context_line":"            LOG.error(\u0027Migration %(mig)s has allocations against \u0027"},{"line_number":4129,"context_line":"                      \u0027more than one provider %(rps)s. This should not be \u0027"},{"line_number":4130,"context_line":"                      \u0027possible, but reverting it anyway.\u0027,"},{"line_number":4131,"context_line":"                      {\u0027mig\u0027: migration.uuid,"},{"line_number":4132,"context_line":"                       \u0027rps\u0027: \u0027,\u0027.join(orig_alloc.keys())},"},{"line_number":4133,"context_line":"                      instance\u003dinstance)"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":2,"id":"3f79a3b5_80d4901f","line":4130,"range":{"start_line":4128,"start_character":0,"end_line":4130,"end_character":59},"updated":"2018-10-25 12:06:26.000000000","message":"with nested, this is definitely a possibility...","commit_id":"e936b82a4299f887239186e2a593fc3e010beaae"}]}