)]}'
{"nova/tests/functional/regressions/test_bug_1825537.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":11904,"name":"Sean McGinnis","email":"sean.mcginnis@gmail.com","username":"SeanM"},"change_message_id":"a275a4bcab6705c8af11cb5812685e6a211d68c0","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":88,"context_line":""},{"line_number":89,"context_line":"class FinishResizeErrorAllocationCleanupLegacyTestCase("},{"line_number":90,"context_line":"        FinishResizeErrorAllocationCleanupTestCase):"},{"line_number":91,"context_line":"    \"\"\"Variant of FinishResizeErrorAllocationCleanupTestCase which does not"},{"line_number":92,"context_line":"    use migration-based allocations, e.g. tests the scenario that there are"},{"line_number":93,"context_line":"    older computes in the deployment so the source and dest node allocations"},{"line_number":94,"context_line":"    are doubled up on the instance consumer record rather than the migration"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"3fa7e38b_8e78dc8f","line":91,"updated":"2019-10-17 20:40:20.000000000","message":"*grumble, grumble, pep257, grumble*","commit_id":"343daa98e006e019ef3ce0bc1ee2a6a7fe03c916"}]}