)]}'
{"nova/virt/libvirt/config.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":14070,"name":"Eric Fried","email":"openstack@fried.cc","username":"efried"},"change_message_id":"bd5d92e50d31da70098273c2a032609d7d879290","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":990,"context_line":""},{"line_number":991,"context_line":"    @property"},{"line_number":992,"context_line":"    def uses_virtio(self):"},{"line_number":993,"context_line":"        return \u0027virtio\u0027 in self.target_bus"},{"line_number":994,"context_line":""},{"line_number":995,"context_line":"    def format_dom(self):"},{"line_number":996,"context_line":"        dev \u003d super(LibvirtConfigGuestDisk, self).format_dom()"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"3fa7e38b_2778a9bf","line":993,"range":{"start_line":993,"start_character":24,"end_line":993,"end_character":26},"updated":"2019-12-02 17:45:10.000000000","message":"I\u0027m slightly concerned about this `in` (versus `\u003d\u003d`). Are there circumstances under which \u0027virtio\u0027 is legitimately a proper *subset* of the target_bus string?\n\nRegardless, this makes the patch more than just a straight refactor.","commit_id":"c667b928905d79af580cd961a8fe3b65339d3654"}]}
