)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":4690,"name":"melanie witt","display_name":"melwitt","email":"melwittt@gmail.com","username":"melwitt"},"change_message_id":"e44d3b36f28dd4916affa2ac1961a6ee2d8ba711","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"0ec2c0cc_51087f1e","updated":"2022-02-16 17:18:51.000000000","message":"+1 what elodilles said, change looks good, conflict documented correctly in the commit message, LGTM","commit_id":"70f75ac98146a3f7804074c188d125d4c5338f46"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"eaa9a8bf96d6cfda2580256b51b3ad073149ffb1","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"390bba7d_85eaabff","updated":"2022-02-15 17:24:42.000000000","message":"The backport looks OK to me: \n* CI related patch\n* conflict is mentioned in the commit message\n* merged in master\n\nThis patch reduces nova-next gate failures by skipping test cases, which is usually not a best thing to do, but perhaps now it\u0027s better to avoid intermittent / not related failures, that otherwise would exercises Zuul unnecessarily until the patch is not fixed :/\n","commit_id":"70f75ac98146a3f7804074c188d125d4c5338f46"},{"author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"change_message_id":"b393c5b46b1eda51d02b91c8cab464e566862117","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"b032c369_10071a4a","updated":"2022-02-11 12:17:33.000000000","message":"yepp I saw this happen multiple times","commit_id":"70f75ac98146a3f7804074c188d125d4c5338f46"}]}
