)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"f3f27942e7252b5c074a3e95b2d09521d5187d3e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"639d096f_818f368e","updated":"2022-08-25 14:04:46.000000000","message":"i shoudl provide more context for the -2\ni expalined this on irc but captureing it here.\n\nthis is not a bug or a know issue its intentioinally not supprot\nas allowing attchment of neutron port via neuton would not work for sriov type ports or cyborg prots.\n\nin general it also woudl not populate the virtual interfaces table\nand coudl break other internal assumtion in nova.\n\nwe only supprot interface attach/detach via nova today and we want to maintain that going forward.\n\n\nthe corect way to adress the bug is to fix neutron by making the device_id field setable only with the admin or service role going forward.\n\nit shoudl not be settable by the member role today.\nthat is an latent bug in neutrons default policy\n\nwe shoudl discuss this at the ptg and at a minium any such change in nova to acocomaiate this woudl be a spec as we need to discuss how to cater for sriov ectra. ingeneral however i do not belvie we sould allow this and we should instead block this in neutron.","commit_id":"5231156f975a25bd050050eb45280d9134efb38e"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"4e3478f9d0eaebd81a733aaab1d64c038170ae8d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"9528c18a_cab3436a","updated":"2022-08-25 13:54:15.000000000","message":"this is intentionlly not supported and we dont want to supprot this in the future.","commit_id":"5231156f975a25bd050050eb45280d9134efb38e"}]}