)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"c66bddea1b9e20b3060033449fb488bf46266822","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"fb13551a_481e9d7a","updated":"2024-02-14 15:19:24.000000000","message":"first of all, this is a feature. On the other hand it \u0027fixes\u0027 a bug [1], but based on the discussion on IRC it is not a real bug, but a misunderstanding of the existing behaviour. nevertheless, also based on the IRC discussion, it probably beneficial to operators probably to \u0027fix\u0027 the current behaviour.\n\nanyway, as i wrote on IRC as well: in general, we should not accept feature backports to stable branches, but there can be exceptions IF stable maintainers agree to backport this anyway, as it improves usability for operators and helps to avoid to commit the same mistake.\n\nbesides, this feature was introduced in a backport-compatible manner, meaning, it has a new config option which needs to be set if someone wants the new behaviour, hence, it does not change the default way of operation, or cause any issue on existing deployments when they upgrade.\n\nas i wrote on IRC, i\u0027m not happy with backporting this, but if the team grant exception to this and we are sure we don\u0027t introduce regression, then I\u0027m not against.\n\n+1: this is a clean cherry pick at least ;)\n\n[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1939869","commit_id":"2b6aa37645c14b341549ac5f0396bf5c45c74dc1"}]}
