)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":7166,"name":"Sylvain Bauza","email":"sbauza@redhat.com","username":"sbauza"},"change_message_id":"5954202a5076541c65b1b7565eb4e6dbea18e937","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"e6caff20_3cce4e18","updated":"2024-08-26 15:15:11.000000000","message":"We usually don\u0027t add releasenotes in separate patches but here we just want to signal something we now want to stop supporting so I\u0027m good with that direct approach that will clearly signal that AMI problems won\u0027t be ourselves.","commit_id":"068dbe0779f714339845b9803c2d935bad300a74"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"d1d88d410e759ce9e9947bb2290bdf016d332937","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"d9be662a_98f26de7","updated":"2024-08-26 17:56:25.000000000","message":"recheck obviously unrelated post failure","commit_id":"068dbe0779f714339845b9803c2d935bad300a74"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"1c0293fdc1ad7c40a1e296885a1992ecee74415a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"25106422_a0658237","updated":"2024-08-13 14:58:08.000000000","message":"this is in line with what we have previously discussed so im ok with starting the deprecation process this cycle without declaring which release we will do the removal in.\npractically speaking it would be 2025.2 or later but we don\u0027t need to decided that now to inform users of the eventual removal.","commit_id":"068dbe0779f714339845b9803c2d935bad300a74"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"7f180a1d7d1b017301c1cfd2e36db4d02fe72ada","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"8fc8abe1_9beeadcc","in_reply_to":"e6caff20_3cce4e18","updated":"2024-08-26 15:18:32.000000000","message":"Well, there\u0027s nothing else to add to accompany the reno. Unless we try to go through and `log.warn` when we see AMI used, although it\u0027s sprinkled all over the place so doing that would be hard..","commit_id":"068dbe0779f714339845b9803c2d935bad300a74"}],"releasenotes/notes/deprecate-ami-images-feb10b7d0503fed5.yaml":[{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"1c0293fdc1ad7c40a1e296885a1992ecee74415a","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":5,"context_line":"    case handling for them will be removed in a future release, and Nova will"},{"line_number":6,"context_line":"    stop being able to boot from them at that time. The kernel-id and"},{"line_number":7,"context_line":"    ramdisk-id linkages will continue to be honored from base images and are"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":"    unaffecfted by this deprecation."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"a38cbc27_2d5dbf6e","line":8,"updated":"2024-08-13 14:58:08.000000000","message":"when we actully start doing the removal we may want do provider recommendaions\nin the release not for that to use raw or hopfully gpt as the format for the root disk and to upload the ram/kernel image as raw.\n\nbut for the deprecation im ok to not include that until we have had time to get agreement form glance to add the gpt image time.","commit_id":"068dbe0779f714339845b9803c2d935bad300a74"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"27a919e6bc1d146e801f6702b911bcbe00230f3a","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":5,"context_line":"    case handling for them will be removed in a future release, and Nova will"},{"line_number":6,"context_line":"    stop being able to boot from them at that time. The kernel-id and"},{"line_number":7,"context_line":"    ramdisk-id linkages will continue to be honored from base images and are"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":"    unaffecfted by this deprecation."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"2c0422c1_23bdabf3","line":8,"in_reply_to":"a38cbc27_2d5dbf6e","updated":"2024-08-13 18:28:21.000000000","message":"I think you can use anything for the root disk, so qcow2 should be fine AFAIK. The guest itself doesn\u0027t know anything about it so I can\u0027t imagine it will matter. But yeah, agree we should provide some guidelines when we actually remove it (or disable behind a workaround).","commit_id":"068dbe0779f714339845b9803c2d935bad300a74"}]}