)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"4b87a7bdbafe175c81f3148bcb8874bb3a7b6eef","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":17,"context_line":"At the initial release of the v2.98 API version, it shows the custom"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"image properties, but https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942413"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"suppresses the custom image properties from the API response for"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"the bug fix."},{"line_number":21,"context_line":""},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"This commit adds a new configuration, image_response_extra_properties,"},{"line_number":23,"context_line":"to the api group. This config enables cloud admin to add their"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":2,"id":"dafce41a_4e554bbd","line":20,"updated":"2025-08-22 13:43:03.000000000","message":"that bug fix was ment to be a release blocker\nnova does nto support or allow custom image proeprties to be used\nand we do not all config drive api bahvior like this.\n\nto be very clear the only reason the cnage sin 2.98 were not reverted was becuase i proposed a fix before the release and the only reason that fix didn land before now was because we mised it went into merge conflict after we and appoved it to merge.","commit_id":"251ab138eca381d5fdc48753b92a3c7f02668c2f"}],"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"4b87a7bdbafe175c81f3148bcb8874bb3a7b6eef","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"d59ca1f1_e17180b0","updated":"2025-08-22 13:43:03.000000000","message":"this is not something we should allow.","commit_id":"251ab138eca381d5fdc48753b92a3c7f02668c2f"}]}