)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"change_message_id":"48b68f92aabb44b5034a88f6082b53d986fcbb98","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"9aac7660_5d09e7ab","updated":"2026-03-02 08:27:37.000000000","message":"Looking at the bug report and the fix it feels like this is more of a new feature than a bug fix. \nOriginally shelved_offloading from cell1 and then unshelving to cell2 was not considered when support for shelving to a specific host was added. I\u0027m OK to start supporting such a cross cell unshelve but I\u0027m affraid that this might not be the only fix we need. E.g. I\u0027m wondering what happens with the instance after cross cell unshelved. Is the request spec still points to cell1 or it gets repointed to cell2? Are there differences depending on if the VM originally was targeted to cell1, or just happened to reach cell1?\n\ncc @rene.ribaud@gmail.com","commit_id":"188a509cfb5fa6378077b45b6b03773e8dbc6f86"},{"author":{"_account_id":38865,"name":"Nope","email":"ohnomyvms@gmail.com","username":"ohnomyvms"},"change_message_id":"b3e68e663cd178b28fb166ccdeeba6f75cebc855","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"4677e136_3ce694ec","in_reply_to":"9aac7660_5d09e7ab","updated":"2026-03-02 17:50:56.000000000","message":"To clarify: this does not enable cross-cell unshelve. The fix is needed even when the target host is in the same cell, because in a multi-cell deployment the ComputeNode query has no cell targeting and always hits the API DB. The exclude list entry stays precisely because cross-cell unshelve is a separate, larger problem (as you note).\n\nHappy to add a comment in the code making that scope explicit if it helps.","commit_id":"188a509cfb5fa6378077b45b6b03773e8dbc6f86"},{"author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"change_message_id":"c44e34542a1539f9e0dd1061f87620719aca4428","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"e85d7e3b_4930af7b","in_reply_to":"9aac7660_5d09e7ab","updated":"2026-03-02 08:28:12.000000000","message":"We probably need to understand the situation a bit deeper","commit_id":"188a509cfb5fa6378077b45b6b03773e8dbc6f86"}]}