)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"change_message_id":"0304ebba73fd3df98cb051c40d8ff1db40f3d1bf","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"3621bd10_217aa03b","updated":"2026-04-28 14:49:28.000000000","message":"Honestly we tried this before. It is just a more documented way of the current status quo.","commit_id":"510f73658b8cbb5629b0029471aee4b6c9232715"},{"author":{"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},"change_message_id":"30403e4041aa237501d86290de27877d2cec9064","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"dbcf3d99_36e3044e","updated":"2026-04-24 16:49:38.000000000","message":"I am neutral on this option. I don\u0027t feel it will change anything since we have suggested this as a best practice for many years but I\u0027ve rarely if ever seen it put into practice. I am willing to be convinced, but I\u0027d need to see hard data come the I (2027.1) PTG in October.","commit_id":"510f73658b8cbb5629b0029471aee4b6c9232715"},{"author":{"_account_id":16643,"name":"Goutham Pacha Ravi","email":"gouthampravi@gmail.com","username":"gouthamr"},"change_message_id":"cb1666c5d3fe2f4797300ea1fe84fe9194deba46","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"fa75aadf_30c6a23c","updated":"2026-04-24 22:20:56.000000000","message":"This would require an increased level of scrutiny from a Nova reviewer to verify that a particular SME is indeed considered an SME by an adjacent group. Visually, Option 2 will make this better by marking the +2 more prominently. \n\nUnless, you define a new Gerrit label and add these cores explicitly..","commit_id":"510f73658b8cbb5629b0029471aee4b6c9232715"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"dbb2c0c7dfcfcccbf1c277b352f12b51536f08fc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"5da38119_c1f4dc4e","updated":"2026-04-26 17:43:31.000000000","message":"im nutal o this version as its better then option 4 but still very hand-wavy\nwhere we may disgree on its applicaiton","commit_id":"510f73658b8cbb5629b0029471aee4b6c9232715"},{"author":{"_account_id":16643,"name":"Goutham Pacha Ravi","email":"gouthampravi@gmail.com","username":"gouthamr"},"change_message_id":"06ede0d7af303712e446cdd119fbc4a5dcd4e97b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"e463eaeb_7aa66773","in_reply_to":"fa75aadf_30c6a23c","updated":"2026-04-26 19:10:42.000000000","message":"\u003e Visually, Option 2 will make this better by marking the +2 more prominently.\n\nugh, I meant Option 1.. not Option 2. (Option 2 involves expanding the core teams with the SME groups in an indiscernible manner)","commit_id":"510f73658b8cbb5629b0029471aee4b6c9232715"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"dbb2c0c7dfcfcccbf1c277b352f12b51536f08fc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"72050fd8_7abf0fc4","in_reply_to":"fa75aadf_30c6a23c","updated":"2026-04-26 17:43:31.000000000","message":"i think i would prefer this over option 2 but where i think this really fails is on the definition of who is an sme and wther we all agree on that.\n\noption 1 enabeld us to explcity list those SME\u0027s while not also grantign them permison to all nova repo i.e. nova-spec or os-triats.","commit_id":"510f73658b8cbb5629b0029471aee4b6c9232715"}]}