)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"change_message_id":"6f642be63491a10a9029b66bcd3dcc7152b7eb77","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":10,"context_line":"I43c3994fbbbb96c74e4bc0ccd2bdc51d3caa485e aimed to address  where a"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"functional test involving resize reschedules can time out waiting for"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"the server to reach VERIFY_RESIZE when running under coverage"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"instrumentation (testenv:cover)."},{"line_number":14,"context_line":""},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"The default max_retries\u003d10 with 0.5s sleep gives only ~5 seconds for"},{"line_number":16,"context_line":"finish_resize to complete after multiple reschedule cycles, which is"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"c6916b79_c59bd30e","line":13,"updated":"2026-04-28 04:43:01.000000000","message":"01:50 \u003c melwitt\u003e gibi: same issue except in a different test class :/  not sure if there is some better \n                 non whack-a-mole way we would rather deal with this ^\n              wait_for_state_change\n06:35 \u003c gibi\u003e maybe just change it in the coverage job via an env var passed?\n06:41 \u003c gibi\u003e we have OS_TEST_TIMEOUT as an example for a similar thing. We can have another var like \n              OS_SLOW_ENV_WAIT_FACTOR that defaults to 1 and we can set it to 3 in the coverage env. Then \n              this var can be multiplied in any sleep or retry count we see impacted by the slowness in \n              the coverage env","commit_id":"b29fc5ac77816fa6439a4c5b7d634e59bf89a07f"},{"author":{"_account_id":4690,"name":"melanie witt","display_name":"melwitt","email":"melwittt@gmail.com","username":"melwitt"},"change_message_id":"394ac1abbc2cef7753348e716df9a36cfe95f51c","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":10,"context_line":"I43c3994fbbbb96c74e4bc0ccd2bdc51d3caa485e aimed to address  where a"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"functional test involving resize reschedules can time out waiting for"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"the server to reach VERIFY_RESIZE when running under coverage"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"instrumentation (testenv:cover)."},{"line_number":14,"context_line":""},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"The default max_retries\u003d10 with 0.5s sleep gives only ~5 seconds for"},{"line_number":16,"context_line":"finish_resize to complete after multiple reschedule cycles, which is"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"d2aaff2f_17b83d2c","line":13,"in_reply_to":"c6916b79_c59bd30e","updated":"2026-04-28 16:53:57.000000000","message":"I thought similarly about something like a \"slow test\" multiplier settable via env var, so I am open to doing something like that.","commit_id":"b29fc5ac77816fa6439a4c5b7d634e59bf89a07f"},{"author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"change_message_id":"59e94932b742cc98fecd7826c123ca2d8a6ac7bb","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":10,"context_line":"I43c3994fbbbb96c74e4bc0ccd2bdc51d3caa485e aimed to address  where a"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"functional test involving resize reschedules can time out waiting for"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"the server to reach VERIFY_RESIZE when running under coverage"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"instrumentation (testenv:cover)."},{"line_number":14,"context_line":""},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"The default max_retries\u003d10 with 0.5s sleep gives only ~5 seconds for"},{"line_number":16,"context_line":"finish_resize to complete after multiple reschedule cycles, which is"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"06957755_10306112","line":13,"in_reply_to":"d2aaff2f_17b83d2c","updated":"2026-04-29 07:12:32.000000000","message":"I think it is fair to say that then next time we need a bump patch like this we will go with the generic route.","commit_id":"b29fc5ac77816fa6439a4c5b7d634e59bf89a07f"}],"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"change_message_id":"6f642be63491a10a9029b66bcd3dcc7152b7eb77","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"7f67988f_2e5fe247","updated":"2026-04-28 04:43:01.000000000","message":"I\u0027m OK to land this as the previous. But I also have ideas to make it a bit easier to tweak this globally in the coverage env.","commit_id":"b29fc5ac77816fa6439a4c5b7d634e59bf89a07f"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"867660e8e1fa4b1edb5d95b270ff8ea11d6f6ce8","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"107bc426_51293fce","updated":"2026-04-28 17:33:35.000000000","message":"lgtm","commit_id":"b29fc5ac77816fa6439a4c5b7d634e59bf89a07f"}]}