)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"f4d5074df9288409f777b5f00653907d0c961425","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":12,"context_line":"max_retries\u003d10 with 0.5s sleep gives only ~5 seconds for"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"finish_resize to complete after multiple reschedule cycles, which"},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"is not always enough under the added overhead. Increase max_retries"},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"to 30 (~15 seconds) to accommodate this."},{"line_number":16,"context_line":""},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"Closes-Bug: #2149850"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"f6d6c9fa_1aa0ec69","line":15,"updated":"2026-06-05 01:27:53.000000000","message":"ok so we keep the same interval so that in the case we succeed early we are not going to wait the full 15 second but we will poll for longer. sure.\n\nit makes snese that the profiel the coverage is rungint he code in would make this test slower and that the default timeout may not be enough\n\nif we have to do this for other test in teh futre we may want to codnier makeing this more configureable via env vars or somethign so we can tweak it via the job config.","commit_id":"cf5b6e5d998ff24ed2d56a73aa28872fe0095648"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"f4d5074df9288409f777b5f00653907d0c961425","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":19,"context_line":"Assisted-by: Claude claude-opus-4-6 claude-code-2.1.116"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"Change-Id: I43c3994fbbbb96c74e4bc0ccd2bdc51d3caa485e"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"Signed-off-by: melanie witt \u003cmelwittt@gmail.com\u003e"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"(cherry picked from commit 8d1764fef8657ed528f608ade55492d70f9e53e6)"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"e5d99854_b5a8d992","line":22,"updated":"2026-06-05 01:27:53.000000000","message":"anyway its merged on master and this is a clean cerry pick\n\ndo you knwo when this test was intoduced?\ndo we need this on all stable branches?","commit_id":"cf5b6e5d998ff24ed2d56a73aa28872fe0095648"}],"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":4690,"name":"melanie witt","display_name":"melwitt","email":"melwittt@gmail.com","username":"melwitt"},"change_message_id":"2a1fae19d5dc8bd7f89a7c9e0944826327541fbc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"172ec86b_65053d9f","updated":"2026-05-21 20:43:03.000000000","message":"Proposing due to seeing a fair number of fails of the test_resize_reschedule_uses_host_lists_3_fails test on this branch.","commit_id":"cf5b6e5d998ff24ed2d56a73aa28872fe0095648"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"d364993f25f861c210a80a4c75d27a3c867126e1","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"c7db4690_74307824","in_reply_to":"172ec86b_65053d9f","updated":"2026-06-08 10:38:47.000000000","message":"ACK, thanks, makes sense, let\u0027s make the gate more stable with this patch. (clean cherry pick, merged on master)","commit_id":"cf5b6e5d998ff24ed2d56a73aa28872fe0095648"}]}