)]}'
{"octavia/common/jinja/haproxy/combined_listeners/jinja_cfg.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":34429,"name":"Tom Weininger","email":"dienste@weinimo.de","username":"tweining"},"change_message_id":"21e21b78d228c4796b236ba58187342993465cfe","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":107,"context_line":"            feature_compatibility[constants.POOL_ALPN] \u003d True"},{"line_number":108,"context_line":"        if int(haproxy_versions[0]) \u003e\u003d 2:"},{"line_number":109,"context_line":"            feature_compatibility[lib_consts.PROTOCOL_PROMETHEUS] \u003d True"},{"line_number":110,"context_line":"        # haproxy 2.2 requires insecure-fork-wanted for PING healthchecks"},{"line_number":111,"context_line":"        if versionutils.is_compatible(\"2.2.0\", version, same_major\u003dFalse):"},{"line_number":112,"context_line":"            feature_compatibility[constants.INSECURE_FORK] \u003d True"},{"line_number":113,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"7ff09650_3990c089","line":110,"range":{"start_line":110,"start_character":10,"end_line":110,"end_character":73},"updated":"2022-05-04 09:31:54.000000000","message":"The documentation[1] says \"it is highly recommended that this option is never used\". I wonder if there is really no way around it.\n\n[1] https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/2.2/configuration.html#3.1-insecure-fork-wanted","commit_id":"1ac781812872d4219cf245cf18ca3e93ec1bb035"},{"author":{"_account_id":29244,"name":"Gregory Thiemonge","email":"gthiemon@redhat.com","username":"gthiemonge"},"change_message_id":"3954fb92d79752562d6739fda1f4c7e0f100a119","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":107,"context_line":"            feature_compatibility[constants.POOL_ALPN] \u003d True"},{"line_number":108,"context_line":"        if int(haproxy_versions[0]) \u003e\u003d 2:"},{"line_number":109,"context_line":"            feature_compatibility[lib_consts.PROTOCOL_PROMETHEUS] \u003d True"},{"line_number":110,"context_line":"        # haproxy 2.2 requires insecure-fork-wanted for PING healthchecks"},{"line_number":111,"context_line":"        if versionutils.is_compatible(\"2.2.0\", version, same_major\u003dFalse):"},{"line_number":112,"context_line":"            feature_compatibility[constants.INSECURE_FORK] \u003d True"},{"line_number":113,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"eac93fcd_ea1333c4","line":110,"range":{"start_line":110,"start_character":10,"end_line":110,"end_character":73},"in_reply_to":"7ff09650_3990c089","updated":"2022-09-02 14:10:13.000000000","message":"some user still wants the PING HM, which is not really useful (doesn\u0027t detect that an app is down).\nour recommendation is to not use it, but anyway, if they really want it...","commit_id":"1ac781812872d4219cf245cf18ca3e93ec1bb035"}]}