)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":11628,"name":"Michael Johnson","email":"johnsomor@gmail.com","username":"johnsom"},"change_message_id":"99c795a9aa432467890cff3e02e46cad3e97876f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"aa8d4568_73e29844","updated":"2022-06-29 17:06:29.000000000","message":"This chain seems like a feature/enhancement and it doesn\u0027t have a release note.\nI am on the fence if this qualifies for stable branch backport. I would like to hear other core thoughts.","commit_id":"bc95e34819bed67444c752e59c01a90c0c6df89b"},{"author":{"_account_id":29244,"name":"Gregory Thiemonge","email":"gthiemon@redhat.com","username":"gthiemonge"},"change_message_id":"2825bf3c7d5c480f560b50af90e6144cf28e9f99","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"7b7c09a6_518c39b6","in_reply_to":"aa8d4568_73e29844","updated":"2022-06-30 13:04:07.000000000","message":"well, I think it enhances the logs, but I would not consider it a feature.\nit will be great to have it on stable branches for troubleshooting\n\n@Michael do you think that this commit would break some existing scripts/parsers that would rely on the old format? if so, maybe a release note would be helpful","commit_id":"bc95e34819bed67444c752e59c01a90c0c6df89b"},{"author":{"_account_id":11628,"name":"Michael Johnson","email":"johnsomor@gmail.com","username":"johnsom"},"change_message_id":"63e4c18cb432fe64ee3f37a7362f28a7e0576b19","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"aac76e59_4762d192","updated":"2022-11-16 20:38:23.000000000","message":"LGTM","commit_id":"2cb52fe60abd3f073daebc1eafda0394c70d8814"}]}