)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":16011,"name":"James Denton","email":"james.denton@outlook.com","username":"busterswt"},"change_message_id":"9e331447e49b016535baaab736f5864c8b28a8c1","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"b30c25be_3b295b41","updated":"2022-03-21 13:52:41.000000000","message":"Any idea how this behaves on an install w/ an existing bridge set to None? Will the task change that to Standalone or break? Also, I believe not specifying network_interface in the provider block will skip this task entirely","commit_id":"f94959745c59f8978d5ed2592b3f2007ff8b28aa"},{"author":{"_account_id":16011,"name":"James Denton","email":"james.denton@outlook.com","username":"busterswt"},"change_message_id":"0436c8fa642ade2d1a06e9a53450b11276ec7391","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"408a395c_f1126561","updated":"2022-03-21 14:02:40.000000000","message":"The answer is.. when fail_mode is explicit None, you can change it to standalone or secure (back and forth) without issue. Once defined, you can\u0027t set to None. LGTM, thanks!","commit_id":"f94959745c59f8978d5ed2592b3f2007ff8b28aa"},{"author":{"_account_id":16011,"name":"James Denton","email":"james.denton@outlook.com","username":"busterswt"},"change_message_id":"3087dad6812fc0e94e3d43752476f656581c0af3","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"0f8be667_e6ab64fe","updated":"2022-03-21 23:30:34.000000000","message":"recheck","commit_id":"f94959745c59f8978d5ed2592b3f2007ff8b28aa"},{"author":{"_account_id":25023,"name":"Jonathan Rosser","email":"jonathan.rosser@rd.bbc.co.uk","username":"jrosser"},"change_message_id":"c0dd726c4537334884193819546f08f67eb72499","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"d311787b_e4477889","updated":"2022-03-21 18:30:26.000000000","message":"recheck","commit_id":"f94959745c59f8978d5ed2592b3f2007ff8b28aa"},{"author":{"_account_id":28619,"name":"Dmitriy Rabotyagov","email":"noonedeadpunk@gmail.com","username":"noonedeadpunk"},"change_message_id":"d1b0f0a5b229de01579ec45bf7403fae3202edc7","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"ecaf994b_ff1b15fe","updated":"2022-03-22 12:58:15.000000000","message":"recheck","commit_id":"f94959745c59f8978d5ed2592b3f2007ff8b28aa"},{"author":{"_account_id":34653,"name":"Danila Balagansky","email":"dbalagansky@me.com","username":"dbalagansky"},"change_message_id":"6afba4dbe7c5a08c712aadcde1984519af626a8e","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"70711c48_ff3f10c0","in_reply_to":"408a395c_f1126561","updated":"2022-03-21 19:47:13.000000000","message":"According to man ovs-vswitchd.conf.db: \n\nThe default is standalone if the value is unset, but future versions of Open vSwitch may change the default.\n\nSo it should be safe on existing bridge, where fail_mode isn\u0027t set, albeit, it would be changed to explicit standalone. \n\nThere is separate action to clear previously set fail_mode: ovs-vsctl del-fail-mode \u003cbridge\u003e, but no counterpart for it in openvswitch_bridge module.\n\nSo, to summarize: prior to this change, if fail_mode was explicitly set to any value, this task would fail. With this change, it would set fail_mode to explicit standalone.","commit_id":"f94959745c59f8978d5ed2592b3f2007ff8b28aa"},{"author":{"_account_id":16011,"name":"James Denton","email":"james.denton@outlook.com","username":"busterswt"},"change_message_id":"3087dad6812fc0e94e3d43752476f656581c0af3","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"b99351ca_58b16566","in_reply_to":"70711c48_ff3f10c0","updated":"2022-03-21 23:30:34.000000000","message":"Ack","commit_id":"f94959745c59f8978d5ed2592b3f2007ff8b28aa"}]}