)]}'
{"app/js/controllers/home.js":[{"author":{"_account_id":18158,"name":"Bruno Tavares","email":"btavare@thoughtworks.com","username":"bltavares"},"change_message_id":"1e82d0280aef2145f2ee5c1371a3ce99f58c8045","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":38,"context_line":"      }"},{"line_number":39,"context_line":"    };"},{"line_number":40,"context_line":""},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"    for (var dateString in data.runs) {"},{"line_number":42,"context_line":"      if (data.runs.hasOwnProperty(dateString)) {"},{"line_number":43,"context_line":"        var date \u003d dateString;"},{"line_number":44,"context_line":"        var totalPass \u003d 0;"}],"source_content_type":"text/javascript","patch_set":2,"id":"5a2ca52d_d6abd473","line":41,"updated":"2015-10-15 21:12:41.000000000","message":"I would rather use `data.runs.forEach(function (dateString)` instead of having a `for` + `hasOwnProperty` check.\n\nThis is less of a chance to forget the `hasOwnProperty` check and receive unexpected keys.\n\nI think it would be ok to let this go ahead, as the idea is just to adjust to lint issues.","commit_id":"1e7615fd52f5061e226475863c10c2ec1d824c0c"}]}