)]}'
{"app/js/factories/project.js":[{"author":{"_account_id":18064,"name":"Dhiana","email":"ddeva@thoughtworks.com","username":"dhiana"},"change_message_id":"59abaae3b3f7c2afc461e07ccb773296bc4c95da","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":29,"context_line":"          aggregatedMetrics.failures +\u003d 1;"},{"line_number":30,"context_line":"        } else if (run.pass \u003e 0) {"},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"          aggregatedMetrics.passes +\u003d 1;"},{"line_number":32,"context_line":"        } else {"},{"line_number":33,"context_line":"          aggregatedMetrics.skips +\u003d 1;"},{"line_number":34,"context_line":"        }"},{"line_number":35,"context_line":"      });"}],"source_content_type":"text/javascript","patch_set":1,"id":"da85f559_a778a7f9","line":32,"updated":"2015-11-13 18:49:14.000000000","message":"Did the concept of skipped run (not test) exist?","commit_id":"6e18efde81a82a4d5178427c881d54512f916233"},{"author":{"_account_id":18064,"name":"Dhiana","email":"ddeva@thoughtworks.com","username":"dhiana"},"change_message_id":"5635c0ded9e73d289fa24df1fd8298b8e0c7d390","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":29,"context_line":"          aggregatedMetrics.failures +\u003d 1;"},{"line_number":30,"context_line":"        } else if (run.pass \u003e 0) {"},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"          aggregatedMetrics.passes +\u003d 1;"},{"line_number":32,"context_line":"        } else {"},{"line_number":33,"context_line":"          aggregatedMetrics.skips +\u003d 1;"},{"line_number":34,"context_line":"        }"},{"line_number":35,"context_line":"      });"}],"source_content_type":"text/javascript","patch_set":1,"id":"da85f559_9d87f411","line":32,"updated":"2015-11-13 19:36:36.000000000","message":"I would say, yes.\nIf there\u0027s only two concepts for runs now, let\u0027s keep things simple.\nIt would put 0 pass / 0 fail / 0 skip and 0 pass / 0 fail / 1 skip in the same bucket, anyways.\nLess is better.","commit_id":"6e18efde81a82a4d5178427c881d54512f916233"},{"author":{"_account_id":18001,"name":"Caio Carrara","email":"ccarrara@thoughtworks.com","username":"caiocarrara"},"change_message_id":"2334520948f9e164be2a63fc71680563ebc32564","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":29,"context_line":"          aggregatedMetrics.failures +\u003d 1;"},{"line_number":30,"context_line":"        } else if (run.pass \u003e 0) {"},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"          aggregatedMetrics.passes +\u003d 1;"},{"line_number":32,"context_line":"        } else {"},{"line_number":33,"context_line":"          aggregatedMetrics.skips +\u003d 1;"},{"line_number":34,"context_line":"        }"},{"line_number":35,"context_line":"      });"}],"source_content_type":"text/javascript","patch_set":1,"id":"da85f559_9d9a94c4","line":32,"in_reply_to":"da85f559_a778a7f9","updated":"2015-11-13 19:25:57.000000000","message":"Actually we choose assume if a run doesn\u0027t have fail nor pass positive value it should be counted as skip in aggregated metrics. If I\u0027m not wrong, this value is not used anywhere up to now. Do you think we shouldn\u0027t do that?","commit_id":"6e18efde81a82a4d5178427c881d54512f916233"}]}