)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":167,"name":"Christian Berendt","email":"berendt@osism.tech","username":"berendt"},"change_message_id":"92a21d4084539de50d9cb5b05cba7598524ba30e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":6,"context_line":""},{"line_number":7,"context_line":"changed section_telemetry_data_collection xml"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"removed etc. per doc conventions for consistency"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":""},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"Change-Id: Iafbf063cb982cbe9d840198becbab62eea607118"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"1aca2d91_99b6323c","line":9,"updated":"2015-05-06 20:19:30.000000000","message":"I do not like this kind of commit message (same comment for the other review requests you recently opened). I think it is not necessary to note in the title of the commit message which file changed, this is directly visible in the commit itself. I would prefer to simply note what changed (removed latin abbreviation etc) in the title and to reference the conventions in the body of the commit message (as of our conventions at ... we do not use the latin abbr. etc).","commit_id":"c52da10479f9c91b9a977f2000919d5d440f6679"}]}