)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":20870,"name":"Alex Kavanagh","email":"alex@ajkavanagh.co.uk","username":"ajkavanagh"},"change_message_id":"8d130984273ca62d0c997c016b51a8866f6a1724","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"a4501243_5ba409c5","updated":"2021-10-15 10:29:05.000000000","message":"I have a slight concern here as we still need py35 for our stable/21.04 and (then) stable/21.10 tests which still support xenial.","commit_id":"8b83ad5dc49004f6b435f243ae7b34813690e0ad"},{"author":{"_account_id":11805,"name":"Corey Bryant","email":"corey.bryant@canonical.com","username":"coreycb"},"change_message_id":"5767cc251ddeae60a0fff3970c3c60a68600e962","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"61941105_e45b3a94","updated":"2021-10-15 17:00:35.000000000","message":"I\u0027m not sure how well the yoga job fits with the charms which support multiple openstack releases.\n\nUsing charm-cinder as an example, it seems that it would be nice to specify the exact py3 jobs that are supported. I\u0027ve put a review up at: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-cinder/+/814199\n\nThat just uses py36. If we went with this route it probably should have a py37?, py38, and py39 job specified as well.","commit_id":"c11d3e7b01fbdda7fc4f3d52a2d9bc97a445edd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":20870,"name":"Alex Kavanagh","email":"alex@ajkavanagh.co.uk","username":"ajkavanagh"},"change_message_id":"1bb202cde36e93ebcdd437765f62b8b8a9508879","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"207c2ae5_30ebd974","updated":"2021-10-16 11:27:10.000000000","message":"This is probably longer term, but maybe we shouldn\u0027t be speccing the jobs \u0027here\u0027, but using the .zuul.d/ option in the projects (charms) to lay out what we want in check.yaml and gate.yaml files on a per charm basis.  Then we could have a base set (in release-tools, or maybe some qa-tools repo), and specialise/override using a custom.yaml as needed per charm?","commit_id":"c11d3e7b01fbdda7fc4f3d52a2d9bc97a445edd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":11805,"name":"Corey Bryant","email":"corey.bryant@canonical.com","username":"coreycb"},"change_message_id":"6819053998267ab081845d48b2aa451c7fce632c","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"3138d7ca_08eb0c66","in_reply_to":"61941105_e45b3a94","updated":"2021-10-15 17:41:21.000000000","message":"well probably not py37","commit_id":"c11d3e7b01fbdda7fc4f3d52a2d9bc97a445edd7"}]}