)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":20870,"name":"Alex Kavanagh","email":"alex@ajkavanagh.co.uk","username":"ajkavanagh"},"change_message_id":"3a2b90c5a4f38b50a1abe97be0799cacd108d3f9","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"f051103b_340704e1","updated":"2023-02-16 12:46:07.000000000","message":"LGTM; this is consistent with charm jobs in general.  Thanks!","commit_id":"dbd9e62e9585daaf3766a7c4d702df264ec41c20"},{"author":{"_account_id":6547,"name":"Andreas Jaeger","email":"jaegerandi@gmail.com","username":"jaegerandi"},"change_message_id":"ede154e3e4f3592b1590613b78327a6ba00265d3","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"ed37fb7d_27f067c2","updated":"2023-02-21 09:09:54.000000000","message":"The TC updated the generic templates, see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/856903 . Is this something that should be done for Charm testing as well?","commit_id":"dbd9e62e9585daaf3766a7c4d702df264ec41c20"},{"author":{"_account_id":11805,"name":"Corey Bryant","email":"corey.bryant@canonical.com","username":"coreycb"},"change_message_id":"3cf0ac49a5a4f3e3982a95d41921963f68790b4b","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"55bbdea1_756c4733","in_reply_to":"ed37fb7d_27f067c2","updated":"2023-02-21 15:34:30.000000000","message":"Thanks for the pointer Andreas. Yes, I think this would be a much nicer approach. I think I\u0027ll propose a stable/antelope \u0027branches\u0027 change for \u0027openstack-python3-charm-jobs\u0027 now so that we don\u0027t forget it. And I\u0027ll abandon this change.","commit_id":"dbd9e62e9585daaf3766a7c4d702df264ec41c20"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"d39006368c74b6fed179dbfdeb5fb815e6e82329","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":4,"id":"bae42cbc_267e0f90","updated":"2023-02-21 20:53:02.000000000","message":"Thanks Corey for updating it. Few comments inline.\n\nAlso this needs to wait until 2022.1 is releaed or all project has stable/2023.1 branch cut. Otherwise we end up updating the testing for 2023.1 (current master) also.","commit_id":"d0508b894e065cf89edf037b480e49b737a9fc8c"}],"zuul.d/project-templates.yaml":[{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"d39006368c74b6fed179dbfdeb5fb815e6e82329","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":661,"context_line":"        - openstack-tox-py38:"},{"line_number":662,"context_line":"            branches:"},{"line_number":663,"context_line":"              - master"},{"line_number":664,"context_line":"              - stable/antelope"},{"line_number":665,"context_line":"        - openstack-tox-py310:"},{"line_number":666,"context_line":"            branches:"},{"line_number":667,"context_line":"              - master"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":4,"id":"5fc39f5a_3188c353","line":664,"range":{"start_line":664,"start_character":16,"end_line":664,"end_character":31},"updated":"2023-02-21 20:53:02.000000000","message":"this will be stable/2023.1 with release version. But I am waiting for those branch to be created just to make sure.","commit_id":"d0508b894e065cf89edf037b480e49b737a9fc8c"},{"author":{"_account_id":11805,"name":"Corey Bryant","email":"corey.bryant@canonical.com","username":"coreycb"},"change_message_id":"5bed0134a892d18fea0e92cef63c2b2889d944ab","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":661,"context_line":"        - openstack-tox-py38:"},{"line_number":662,"context_line":"            branches:"},{"line_number":663,"context_line":"              - master"},{"line_number":664,"context_line":"              - stable/antelope"},{"line_number":665,"context_line":"        - openstack-tox-py310:"},{"line_number":666,"context_line":"            branches:"},{"line_number":667,"context_line":"              - master"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":4,"id":"aecc6310_678cd8b4","line":664,"range":{"start_line":664,"start_character":16,"end_line":664,"end_character":31},"in_reply_to":"5fc39f5a_3188c353","updated":"2023-02-22 14:33:31.000000000","message":"Hi gmann, thanks for taking a look. The charm projects use the \u0027delay-release\u0027 option and these jobs are specific to the charms projects. With that said, does the charms project have the flexibility to stick with the stable/antelope branch naming?","commit_id":"d0508b894e065cf89edf037b480e49b737a9fc8c"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"39cb9ee84ea895f800a031e36a8a749ffadd5d33","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":661,"context_line":"        - openstack-tox-py38:"},{"line_number":662,"context_line":"            branches:"},{"line_number":663,"context_line":"              - master"},{"line_number":664,"context_line":"              - stable/antelope"},{"line_number":665,"context_line":"        - openstack-tox-py310:"},{"line_number":666,"context_line":"            branches:"},{"line_number":667,"context_line":"              - master"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":4,"id":"b0ef5cc2_da5fec1c","line":664,"range":{"start_line":664,"start_character":16,"end_line":664,"end_character":31},"in_reply_to":"aecc6310_678cd8b4","updated":"2023-02-22 20:43:25.000000000","message":"ah right and that is why we have this separate job. Sorry I forgot.\n\non stable/antelope naming. TC is now moved the direction to use the release version as primary identifier instead of name and name will be used only for marketing purpose. That is why stable branch name will be with stable/\u003crelease version\u003e\n\n- https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/release-naming.html","commit_id":"d0508b894e065cf89edf037b480e49b737a9fc8c"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"d39006368c74b6fed179dbfdeb5fb815e6e82329","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":658,"context_line":"    check:"},{"line_number":659,"context_line":"      jobs:"},{"line_number":660,"context_line":"        - openstack-tox-pep8"},{"line_number":661,"context_line":"        - openstack-tox-py38:"},{"line_number":662,"context_line":"            branches:"},{"line_number":663,"context_line":"              - master"},{"line_number":664,"context_line":"              - stable/antelope"},{"line_number":665,"context_line":"        - openstack-tox-py310:"},{"line_number":666,"context_line":"            branches:"},{"line_number":667,"context_line":"              - master"},{"line_number":668,"context_line":"              - stable/antelope"},{"line_number":669,"context_line":"    gate:"},{"line_number":670,"context_line":"      jobs:"},{"line_number":671,"context_line":"        - openstack-tox-pep8"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":4,"id":"a6e67641_8990152d","line":668,"range":{"start_line":661,"start_character":0,"end_line":668,"end_character":31},"updated":"2023-02-21 20:53:02.000000000","message":"I have pushed patch to move other generic template to 2023.2 cycle testing tuntime but missed to do for charm That is still WIP as that needs to be wait until 2023.1 is rleased - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/873051\n\nAs per 2023.2 testing runtime we need to test py39 and py310. and py38 and py310 needs to continue running on stable/2023.1.\n\nwe can do something below\n\n        # py38 job is required to run only for 2023.1 release\n        - openstack-tox-py38:\n            branches:\n              - stable/2023.1\n        # py39 job is required to run from 2023.2 release onwards\n        - openstack-tox-py39:\n            branches:\n              - master\n        - openstack-tox-py310","commit_id":"d0508b894e065cf89edf037b480e49b737a9fc8c"}]}