)]}'
{"id":"openstack%2Fopenstacksdk~801864","triplet_id":"openstack%2Fopenstacksdk~master~I277c2a9269dff7602b3f36e3bb7b5fe2a5be1819","project":"openstack/openstacksdk","branch":"master","topic":"drop-block-storage-v2","hashtags":[],"change_id":"I277c2a9269dff7602b3f36e3bb7b5fe2a5be1819","subject":"Remove block storage v2 func tests","status":"ABANDONED","created":"2021-07-22 14:27:16.000000000","updated":"2021-07-22 16:00:31.000000000","total_comment_count":0,"unresolved_comment_count":0,"has_review_started":true,"meta_rev_id":"bc0125f55d7138538fd0a82a7123f919b1c1d49d","_number":801864,"virtual_id_number":801864,"owner":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"actions":{},"labels":{"Verified":{"all":[{"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"}],"values":{"-2":"Fails","-1":"Doesn\u0027t seem to work"," 0":"No score","+1":"Works for me","+2":"Verified"},"description":"","default_value":0,"optional":true},"Code-Review":{"all":[{"value":0,"permitted_voting_range":{"min":-2,"max":2},"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},{"value":0,"permitted_voting_range":{"min":-2,"max":2},"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"}],"values":{"-2":"Do not merge","-1":"This patch needs further work before it can be merged"," 0":"No score","+1":"Looks good to me, but someone else must approve","+2":"Looks good to me (core reviewer)"},"description":"","default_value":0,"optional":true},"Workflow":{"all":[{"value":0,"permitted_voting_range":{"min":-1,"max":1},"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"}],"values":{"-1":"Work in progress"," 0":"Ready for reviews","+1":"Approved"},"description":"","default_value":0,"optional":true},"Allow-Post-Review":{"all":[{"value":0,"permitted_voting_range":{"min":0,"max":1},"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"}],"values":{" 0":"Abstain","+1":"Approved for Zuul Post Review Pipeline"},"description":"","default_value":0,"optional":true}},"removable_reviewers":[],"reviewers":{"REVIEWER":[{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},{"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"}],"CC":[{"_account_id":10135,"name":"Lee Yarwood","display_name":"Lee Yarwood","email":"lyarwood@redhat.com","username":"lyarwood"}]},"pending_reviewers":{},"reviewer_updates":[{"updated":"2021-07-22 14:29:52.000000000","updated_by":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"reviewer":{"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},"state":"REVIEWER"},{"updated":"2021-07-22 14:31:33.000000000","updated_by":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"reviewer":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"state":"REVIEWER"},{"updated":"2021-07-22 14:49:33.000000000","updated_by":{"_account_id":10135,"name":"Lee Yarwood","display_name":"Lee Yarwood","email":"lyarwood@redhat.com","username":"lyarwood"},"reviewer":{"_account_id":10135,"name":"Lee Yarwood","display_name":"Lee Yarwood","email":"lyarwood@redhat.com","username":"lyarwood"},"state":"CC"}],"messages":[{"id":"466dd66b71ebd23e33638b50a9ba8079aba61ce5","tag":"autogenerated:gerrit:newPatchSet","author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"date":"2021-07-22 14:27:16.000000000","message":"Uploaded patch set 1.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"47f09750d1eec71e97d9a3e169e0fc57d77b2f8a","author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"date":"2021-07-22 14:31:33.000000000","message":"Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1\n\nwe have v3 test coverage in https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/tree/master/openstack/tests/functional/block_storage/v3","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"da341510b7532706916b11034d00ce15a1f3c1dd","tag":"autogenerated:gerrit:newPatchSet","author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"date":"2021-07-22 14:36:31.000000000","message":"Uploaded patch set 2.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"1bb536f8560ea1a132e0a1ecf45467d04a9b1d14","author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"date":"2021-07-22 14:36:59.000000000","message":"Patch Set 1:\n\n\u003e Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1\n\u003e \n\u003e we have v3 test coverage in https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/tree/master/openstack/tests/functional/block_storage/v3\n\nit is not as clear cut as I thought and I don\u0027t have much sdk experience so in PS2 I fall back to only remove the v2 func test to unblock the gatye","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":1},{"id":"1702611867990e3fedf5183970f2b5140a5a199c","author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"date":"2021-07-22 14:45:21.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\n\u003e Patch Set 1:\n\u003e \n\u003e \u003e Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e we have v3 test coverage in https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/tree/master/openstack/tests/functional/block_storage/v3\n\u003e \n\u003e it is not as clear cut as I thought and I don\u0027t have much sdk experience so in PS2 I fall back to only remove the v2 func test to unblock the gatye\n\nbut v2 endpoint will be giving error now as test complaining, I think we can either remove the code also or redirect it to v3 if we want to keep compatibility of osc for sometime","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"c4461c846b8e02364585788429fa47ff99e1ebeb","author":{"_account_id":10135,"name":"Lee Yarwood","display_name":"Lee Yarwood","email":"lyarwood@redhat.com","username":"lyarwood"},"date":"2021-07-22 14:49:33.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\n\u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \n\u003e \u003e Patch Set 1:\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e we have v3 test coverage in https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/tree/master/openstack/tests/functional/block_storage/v3\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e it is not as clear cut as I thought and I don\u0027t have much sdk experience so in PS2 I fall back to only remove the v2 func test to unblock the gatye\n\u003e \n\u003e but v2 endpoint will be giving error now as test complaining, I think we can either remove the code also or redirect it to v3 if we want to keep compatibility of osc for sometime\n\nDoes the SDK support running against older versions of OpenStack where the endpoints are still available?\n\nIOW should we retain support and tests but skip them in \u003e\u003dXena?","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"3b45751cac724415d85186713ba3f97f7b5c4bcc","author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"date":"2021-07-22 14:51:01.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\n\u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \n\u003e \u003e Patch Set 1:\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e we have v3 test coverage in https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/tree/master/openstack/tests/functional/block_storage/v3\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e it is not as clear cut as I thought and I don\u0027t have much sdk experience so in PS2 I fall back to only remove the v2 func test to unblock the gatye\n\u003e \n\u003e but v2 endpoint will be giving error now as test complaining, I think we can either remove the code also or redirect it to v3 if we want to keep compatibility of osc for sometime\n\nThis patch basically removing the tests that blocking the gate. I agree the probably the v2 support should be removed from the sdk too, but I\u0027m not sure how to do that in a timely manner. So I choose to unblock the gate as fast as I can.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"12dc9897120f343a6effc20316d1cf9ce7178a03","author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"date":"2021-07-22 14:52:06.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\n\u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \n\u003e \u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 1:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e we have v3 test coverage in https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/tree/master/openstack/tests/functional/block_storage/v3\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e it is not as clear cut as I thought and I don\u0027t have much sdk experience so in PS2 I fall back to only remove the v2 func test to unblock the gatye\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e but v2 endpoint will be giving error now as test complaining, I think we can either remove the code also or redirect it to v3 if we want to keep compatibility of osc for sometime\n\u003e \n\u003e Does the SDK support running against older versions of OpenStack where the endpoints are still available?\n\u003e \n\u003e IOW should we retain support and tests but skip them in \u003e\u003dXena?\n\nAs far as I see sdk has stable branches. So I assume sdk released from that stable/wallaby branch should be used against wallaby clouds. But I can be mistaken.","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"d683eb323bedec63a78b302809d44b54a9b0414f","author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"date":"2021-07-22 14:55:43.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\n\u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \n\u003e \u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 1:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e we have v3 test coverage in https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/tree/master/openstack/tests/functional/block_storage/v3\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e it is not as clear cut as I thought and I don\u0027t have much sdk experience so in PS2 I fall back to only remove the v2 func test to unblock the gatye\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e but v2 endpoint will be giving error now as test complaining, I think we can either remove the code also or redirect it to v3 if we want to keep compatibility of osc for sometime\n\u003e \n\u003e Does the SDK support running against older versions of OpenStack where the endpoints are still available?\n\u003e \n\u003e IOW should we retain support and tests but skip them in \u003e\u003dXena?\n\ngood point. Also did we publish warning for v2 usage in sdk if so then it is ok to remove now otherwise I think redirecting to v3 or old cinder (if possible ) should be done instead of removing it immediately without any warning.\n\nI am not seeing warning in v2 code unless it is added in some other place? https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/tree/master/openstack/block_storage/v2","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"985abfaffd802d55a4fed927d4180ce2452b7a31","author":{"_account_id":10135,"name":"Lee Yarwood","display_name":"Lee Yarwood","email":"lyarwood@redhat.com","username":"lyarwood"},"date":"2021-07-22 15:12:12.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\n\u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \n\u003e \u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 1:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e we have v3 test coverage in https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/tree/master/openstack/tests/functional/block_storage/v3\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e it is not as clear cut as I thought and I don\u0027t have much sdk experience so in PS2 I fall back to only remove the v2 func test to unblock the gatye\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e but v2 endpoint will be giving error now as test complaining, I think we can either remove the code also or redirect it to v3 if we want to keep compatibility of osc for sometime\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e Does the SDK support running against older versions of OpenStack where the endpoints are still available?\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e IOW should we retain support and tests but skip them in \u003e\u003dXena?\n\u003e \n\u003e As far as I see sdk has stable branches. So I assume sdk released from that stable/wallaby branch should be used against wallaby clouds. But I can be mistaken.\n\nIf it\u0027s like the clients then I\u0027m not sure it\u0027s a direct release to release mapping.\n\nAnyway couldn\u0027t we skip the failing functional tests in tox.ini?\n\nhttps://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/master/tox.ini#L31-L41","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"5f0e3f0c325bf8cd9d8d392ff0d0fb62555e6143","author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"date":"2021-07-22 15:42:15.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\n\u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \n\u003e \u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 1:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e we have v3 test coverage in https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/tree/master/openstack/tests/functional/block_storage/v3\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e it is not as clear cut as I thought and I don\u0027t have much sdk experience so in PS2 I fall back to only remove the v2 func test to unblock the gatye\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e but v2 endpoint will be giving error now as test complaining, I think we can either remove the code also or redirect it to v3 if we want to keep compatibility of osc for sometime\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e Does the SDK support running against older versions of OpenStack where the endpoints are still available?\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e IOW should we retain support and tests but skip them in \u003e\u003dXena?\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e As far as I see sdk has stable branches. So I assume sdk released from that stable/wallaby branch should be used against wallaby clouds. But I can be mistaken.\n\u003e \n\u003e If it\u0027s like the clients then I\u0027m not sure it\u0027s a direct release to release mapping.\n\u003e \n\u003e Anyway couldn\u0027t we skip the failing functional tests in tox.ini?\n\u003e \n\u003e https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/master/tox.ini#L31-L41\n\nyeah dine in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/801872","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"4fd126092111121b22ac8526d55dca4cf3fdb4b5","author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"date":"2021-07-22 15:59:58.000000000","message":"Patch Set 2:\n\n\u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \n\u003e \u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 2:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 1:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e we have v3 test coverage in https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/tree/master/openstack/tests/functional/block_storage/v3\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e it is not as clear cut as I thought and I don\u0027t have much sdk experience so in PS2 I fall back to only remove the v2 func test to unblock the gatye\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e but v2 endpoint will be giving error now as test complaining, I think we can either remove the code also or redirect it to v3 if we want to keep compatibility of osc for sometime\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Does the SDK support running against older versions of OpenStack where the endpoints are still available?\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e IOW should we retain support and tests but skip them in \u003e\u003dXena?\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e \u003e As far as I see sdk has stable branches. So I assume sdk released from that stable/wallaby branch should be used against wallaby clouds. But I can be mistaken.\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e If it\u0027s like the clients then I\u0027m not sure it\u0027s a direct release to release mapping.\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e Anyway couldn\u0027t we skip the failing functional tests in tox.ini?\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/master/tox.ini#L31-L41\n\u003e \n\u003e yeah dine in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/801872\n\nOK, your tox.ini skip is less intrusive that my delete. Abandoning this in favor of ^^","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2},{"id":"bc0125f55d7138538fd0a82a7123f919b1c1d49d","tag":"autogenerated:gerrit:abandon","author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"date":"2021-07-22 16:00:31.000000000","message":"Abandoned\n\nabandoning in favor of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/801872","accounts_in_message":[],"_revision_number":2}],"current_revision_number":2,"current_revision":"d4ac0eecb6f980e8d4126caef7365bba1e4257b3","revisions":{"2f590711b08df248ea51f2be3e63428c36b8caf5":{"kind":"REWORK","_number":1,"created":"2021-07-22 14:27:16.000000000","uploader":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"ref":"refs/changes/64/801864/1","fetch":{"anonymous http":{"url":"https://review.opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk","ref":"refs/changes/64/801864/1","commands":{"Checkout":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk refs/changes/64/801864/1 \u0026\u0026 git checkout FETCH_HEAD","Cherry Pick":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk refs/changes/64/801864/1 \u0026\u0026 git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD","Format Patch":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk refs/changes/64/801864/1 \u0026\u0026 git format-patch -1 --stdout FETCH_HEAD","Pull":"git pull https://review.opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk refs/changes/64/801864/1"}}},"commit":{"parents":[{"commit":"9dc4a841145200583ac3f8c56df775a165e5f2f4","subject":"Merge \"Fix import order in accelerator and config unit tests\"","web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/commit/9dc4a841145200583ac3f8c56df775a165e5f2f4"}]}],"author":{"name":"Balazs Gibizer","email":"balazs.gibizer@est.tech","date":"2021-07-22 14:24:03.000000000","tz":120},"committer":{"name":"Balazs Gibizer","email":"balazs.gibizer@est.tech","date":"2021-07-22 14:27:00.000000000","tz":120},"subject":"Remove block storage v2 support","message":"Remove block storage v2 support\n\nCinder deleted the block storage API v2 support[1]. So this is dropped\nfrom the SDK too.\n\n[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/792299\n\nChange-Id: I277c2a9269dff7602b3f36e3bb7b5fe2a5be1819\n","web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/commit/2f590711b08df248ea51f2be3e63428c36b8caf5"}],"resolve_conflicts_web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/commit/2f590711b08df248ea51f2be3e63428c36b8caf5"}]},"branch":"refs/heads/master"},"d4ac0eecb6f980e8d4126caef7365bba1e4257b3":{"kind":"REWORK","_number":2,"created":"2021-07-22 14:36:31.000000000","uploader":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"ref":"refs/changes/64/801864/2","fetch":{"anonymous http":{"url":"https://review.opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk","ref":"refs/changes/64/801864/2","commands":{"Checkout":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk refs/changes/64/801864/2 \u0026\u0026 git checkout FETCH_HEAD","Cherry Pick":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk refs/changes/64/801864/2 \u0026\u0026 git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD","Format Patch":"git fetch https://review.opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk refs/changes/64/801864/2 \u0026\u0026 git format-patch -1 --stdout FETCH_HEAD","Pull":"git pull https://review.opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk refs/changes/64/801864/2"}}},"commit":{"parents":[{"commit":"9dc4a841145200583ac3f8c56df775a165e5f2f4","subject":"Merge \"Fix import order in accelerator and config unit tests\"","web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/commit/9dc4a841145200583ac3f8c56df775a165e5f2f4"}]}],"author":{"name":"Balazs Gibizer","email":"balazs.gibizer@est.tech","date":"2021-07-22 14:34:16.000000000","tz":120},"committer":{"name":"Balazs Gibizer","email":"balazs.gibizer@est.tech","date":"2021-07-22 14:36:12.000000000","tz":120},"subject":"Remove block storage v2 func tests","message":"Remove block storage v2 func tests\n\nCinder deleted the block storage API v2 support[1]. This makes the\nopenstacksdk-functional-devstack failing with\n\n  openstack.exceptions.NotSupported: The block-storage service for\n  devstack:RegionOne exists but does not have any supported versions.\n\nSo this patch removes the v2 functional tests from master as they cannot\nbe run any more. Later patches might needs to remove the whole v2\nsupport.\n\n[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/792299\n\nChange-Id: I277c2a9269dff7602b3f36e3bb7b5fe2a5be1819\n","web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/commit/d4ac0eecb6f980e8d4126caef7365bba1e4257b3"}],"resolve_conflicts_web_links":[{"name":"gitea","tooltip":"Open in GitWeb","url":"https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/commit/d4ac0eecb6f980e8d4126caef7365bba1e4257b3"}]},"branch":"refs/heads/master"}},"requirements":[],"submit_records":[],"submit_requirements":[]}