)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":27900,"name":"Artem Goncharov","email":"artem.goncharov@gmail.com","username":"gtema"},"change_message_id":"9b1b8411280105d1c018d95b8a3adbe9a9c5e494","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"3c8397a0_8f2d9bc8","updated":"2021-10-20 18:15:14.000000000","message":"This is (at least to some extend) already done in R1 branch which will soon land in master. Please check instead there whether something still need to be cleaned.","commit_id":"0d3b813992768b5600ed4458e0f15f8437eb1db7"},{"author":{"_account_id":16688,"name":"Rodolfo Alonso","email":"ralonsoh@redhat.com","username":"rodolfo-alonso-hernandez"},"change_message_id":"d527b589d6e9d9136f09e279763936200088da69","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"409b6eb0_1abbd2ca","in_reply_to":"3c8397a0_8f2d9bc8","updated":"2021-10-21 11:14:41.000000000","message":"For sure, I\u0027ll wait for this branch, there is no rush. I was just trying to remove some annoying messages saying:\n  \"The option [tenant_id] has been deprecated. Please avoid using it.\"","commit_id":"0d3b813992768b5600ed4458e0f15f8437eb1db7"},{"author":{"_account_id":27900,"name":"Artem Goncharov","email":"artem.goncharov@gmail.com","username":"gtema"},"change_message_id":"152f3329fce270068f04f53653546fe3d1c30243","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"154545f7_867e3f77","in_reply_to":"409b6eb0_1abbd2ca","updated":"2021-10-21 11:16:13.000000000","message":"ah, ok. We have noticed this in a different context and will perhaps disable the warninig","commit_id":"0d3b813992768b5600ed4458e0f15f8437eb1db7"},{"author":{"_account_id":27900,"name":"Artem Goncharov","email":"artem.goncharov@gmail.com","username":"gtema"},"change_message_id":"dec34450d76bb23ea58c97df844279ba645d3b5f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"0ef52397_8294ba57","updated":"2021-11-15 18:01:32.000000000","message":"This is already implemented in the feature/r1 branch","commit_id":"f771a5078b194fe6762b09fe3c407e6f851af1a7"},{"author":{"_account_id":16688,"name":"Rodolfo Alonso","email":"ralonsoh@redhat.com","username":"rodolfo-alonso-hernandez"},"change_message_id":"b7298da64589b76c7961b21d40f3162936d3a98f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"d94ba0c6_d8650918","in_reply_to":"0ef52397_8294ba57","updated":"2021-11-15 18:10:16.000000000","message":"Hi Artem, can you provide me the hash of this branch? I can\u0027t find were this patch is implemented.","commit_id":"f771a5078b194fe6762b09fe3c407e6f851af1a7"},{"author":{"_account_id":16688,"name":"Rodolfo Alonso","email":"ralonsoh@redhat.com","username":"rodolfo-alonso-hernandez"},"change_message_id":"f3318e56155bc6d50778e16fc618268d46071167","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"08d5af7b_9318ba31","in_reply_to":"606bdb1a_ef606620","updated":"2021-11-16 08:39:36.000000000","message":"But I don\u0027t understand. What I\u0027m removing in my patch is still present in this branch. \"tenant_id\" is still present in QoS, SG and SG rule objects.\n\nThe goal of this patch is to remove all missing \"tenant_id\" member from any network \"Resource\" class.\n\nI think this patch is legit.","commit_id":"f771a5078b194fe6762b09fe3c407e6f851af1a7"},{"author":{"_account_id":27900,"name":"Artem Goncharov","email":"artem.goncharov@gmail.com","username":"gtema"},"change_message_id":"19b1bb88a5d9c6749518fb42302df5984b208e17","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"606bdb1a_ef606620","in_reply_to":"d94ba0c6_d8650918","updated":"2021-11-15 18:14:12.000000000","message":"https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/feature/r1","commit_id":"f771a5078b194fe6762b09fe3c407e6f851af1a7"}]}