)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":8313,"name":"Lajos Katona","display_name":"lajoskatona","email":"katonalala@gmail.com","username":"elajkat","status":"Ericsson Software Technology"},"change_message_id":"7a391efd085992d7872da890ea510614855821fb","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"948d0c07_4f6ab719","updated":"2024-09-17 09:06:03.000000000","message":"Thanks","commit_id":"57cfd3353fd8dbe43cd52043ac19b4d5fcdd4213"},{"author":{"_account_id":27900,"name":"Artem Goncharov","email":"artem.goncharov@gmail.com","username":"gtema"},"change_message_id":"0c5dcc0cf4f07c83424211c13b6e0fd1691038cc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"ee1f0055_79b9b81b","updated":"2024-09-17 09:52:07.000000000","message":"this is something pretty breaking. At the very beginning of the SDK the cloud layer was very permissive and returned None instead of raising exception. During switch to calling proxy layer inside I kept ignore_missing\u003dTrue to maintain backwards compatibility here. In addition to that we would need to also keep an eye on ansible modules which may still depend on this functionality.","commit_id":"87386ecc868a9bb783025559e5c8291deee6bc22"},{"author":{"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},"change_message_id":"e0b328d3940206e311c065b9e731efb4489c1aee","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"58e09e20_1ac5a19c","in_reply_to":"a8df12a9_c3f9cff9","updated":"2024-09-17 10:59:16.000000000","message":"Yeah, I have only changed the value in a few places, one of which was a clear bug and the others where were use try-except and returning `None` in the except case (which is identical behavior to passing `ignore_missing\u003dTrue`.\n\nThe goal here is not to make thing stricter but rather to make it clear that we\u0027re *intentionally* ignoring missing resources in this places (as opposed to we\u0027ve simply forgotten to set it, like in the preceding patch).","commit_id":"87386ecc868a9bb783025559e5c8291deee6bc22"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"c0e31d0c65743cf296fa1c30a149e121f3f85689","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"a8df12a9_c3f9cff9","in_reply_to":"ee1f0055_79b9b81b","updated":"2024-09-17 09:57:41.000000000","message":"IIUC this change does not change functionality. It adds explicit ignore_missing and the actual value passed to the option is unchanged.","commit_id":"87386ecc868a9bb783025559e5c8291deee6bc22"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"a4ee1c41aac10a9ee32104eaac5c06aa5a2a5017","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"e6607720_9d871a65","updated":"2024-09-25 02:28:18.000000000","message":"recheck post tasks failed because of ssh fingerprint was changed ?","commit_id":"bd6ab754e6e6dc2fa57a830e1d0953716e0115c6"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"23433e32d2a6f6ba9d0baf40cefceb9ce454ac7f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"ced79378_d704f77a","updated":"2024-09-25 06:27:50.000000000","message":"recheck timeout","commit_id":"bd6ab754e6e6dc2fa57a830e1d0953716e0115c6"}]}