)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":16688,"name":"Rodolfo Alonso","email":"ralonsoh@redhat.com","username":"rodolfo-alonso-hernandez"},"change_message_id":"e0a1341419caf0367efbb79ecacec592d91e69bd","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"89c6bd5b_751946a3","updated":"2022-05-11 09:46:15.000000000","message":"To be honest, I don\u0027t see any issue having this patch in the os-vif code. The bridge is created in the same transaction of the port creation. IMO, that\u0027s valid for any circumstance (and something desirable, that any interaction with a DB is done, if possible, in one txn). But maybe I\u0027m missing something here that prevents from having [1] in the repo.\n\n[1]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/830103","commit_id":"6aec1cf1d1dfc59ea42eacc6656c8a20efa5e6a9"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"9201794caedd4a429faf231ceb23e4dca210b234","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"7f3a305f_cada8e40","in_reply_to":"89c6bd5b_751946a3","updated":"2022-05-11 10:01:30.000000000","message":"ya i was going to ask on irc.\n\nwe can revert but moving the bridge creation to the transation is fine in my view","commit_id":"6aec1cf1d1dfc59ea42eacc6656c8a20efa5e6a9"}]}